Is the debt to you or to someone else? If he does not file a response or appear at the hearing, the Judge may order him to pay you if it is owed to you. If it is owed to someone else, the Judge may not do so. Is it overdue?
Michael is in San Jose, California and can be reached at 408-295-4232 or at [email protected] Consultation fees, rates and retainers vary based on need and ability to pay.
If he does not file a response, the court has the option of making a ruling without any input from the other party. If the court feels this would be inequitable and/or that the other side had a good reason for not responding (i.e. he was not properly served), the court may continue out the hearing to give the other side a chance to respond. (A continuance could be given and he may be ordered to file a response if the court cannot make the requested order without consideration of his financial circumstance.) If he has a habit of not responding or actively participating in the litigation and/or wasting the court's time, the court may even consider issuing sanctions. (This latter option would probably require more obstreperous conduct than not filing a response.) I am not trying to be vague in responding, but explaining that the court has great judicial discretion on how to handle financial and property issues depending on the circumstances.
If the court decides to make a ruling without any input from the other party, the court will look at the debt that is in question. The court will look at who it is owed to and whether it is appropriate decided on an OSC (as opposed to being properly resolved as part of any property disposition at trial or in resolution of your case.) For example, if the debt is a mortgage where nonpayment may result in the loss of a community asset, the court may be more inclined to make an order. If the debt is a large sum of money owed to a third-party where no adverse right will be affected if the court does not rule on the matter now, the court may reserve its ruling for some later point in time. Of course such a decision would require the court to take into account the relative incomes, assets and debts of each party and whether any additional information is required in order to make a ruling on the requested matter that is appropriately fair and equitable to both parties.
Best of luck to you!
If you found this answer helpful, let me know by clicking the "Mark as Good Answer" button at the bottom of this answer. Itâ€™s easy and appreciated. This response is intended to be a general statement of law, should not be relied upon as legal advice, does not create an attorney/client relationship and does not create a right to continuing email exchanges.
If this is a debt owed to a creditor but assigned to him in the property division, you still owe the creditor. if you have to pay it your remedy is to sue him for reimbursement, which you almost certainly won't ever get. But no, the court will not "add it to your spousal support."
Years licensed, work experience, educationLegal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awardsLegal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagementsDiscipline