Generally, most if not all states have what is called "implied consent" laws- basically, if you are driving on the roads, you are consenting to being stopped for things such as suspicion of DUI which include the administering of field sobriety tests, breathalyzers, blood tests.
That said, you have the absolute right to DECLINE these tests and ask for an attorney. You also have the right, at all times, to remain silent, but the cops do not have to inform you of this right until you are in custody (arrested generally). So to answer, yes, you DID have the right to speak to a lawyer before answering any questions and if you felt this was violated, and that the cop informed you otherwise, I would not pass go/collect $200 until I spoke to an attorney. Use AVVO's search tool to find one near you ASAP!
The information provided herein is general information only and is not legal advice. The information provided herein does not create an attorney client relationship and is not a substitute for having a consultation with an attorney. It is important to have a consultation with an attorney as the information provided in this forum is limited and cannot possibly cover all potential issues in a given situation.
Mr. Bohren is absolutely correct. Unfortunately the way these implied consent warnings are worded, most citizens do not realize they have the right to refuse any tests or that everything you do is VOLUNTARY. While you do have the right to speak with an attorney regarding your test, it sounds like you were referring to your miranda rights. People hear the miranda rights on tv all the time and many times "lawyer up" or invoke their right to silence until they can speak to a lawyer. This is a widely misunderstood right, which has been exacerbated by tv. The only thing reading those rights does is that it changes what you are saying to the cop from "admissions" to "in custody statements". You need to hire a lawyer in your area asap to try and mitigate what damage was already done by any "admissions" you made prior to invoking your right to silence or right to refuse the test.
Under Colorado law, you don't have the right to consult with an attorney before choosing the type of test. If the officer considered your answer or your conduct to be a refusal to take a test, that can have important consequences in both the DMV action and the criminal case. You should consult with an experienced DUI attorney who can review all of your documentation and advise you on your options.
No, the cop was actually right, you do not have the right to ask an attorney whether you should take a blood test. When you got into the car to drive, you impliedly consented to having your breath or blood tested. You can refuse. Now you need to get an attorney and hope that things work out OK. Good Luck.
R. Jason de Groot, Esq. We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made. I am only licensed in Florida.
Wow. You have a very interesting situation here.
I am assuming that you "blew a .04" on the Preliminary Breath Test ("PBT"). This is a screening device used by the officer to help establish probable cause that you are under the influence.
In order to require you to submit to the roadside sobriety tests, the officer must have first had "probable cause" to suspect you were under the influence. Then, before the officer could require you to submit to any kind of test to determine your BAC, he or she would have to place you under arrest for Driving Under the Influence (or while Impaired by Alcohol).
Your "failure" of the roadsides, along with the result of the PBT, apparently gave the cop the "probable cause" he or she needed to demand you to submit to an analysis of your Blood Alcohol Concentration ("BAC").
At that point, you did NOT have the right to consult with an attorney before taking the test. Colorado Law declares that you had already consented to submit to such a test once a law enforcement officer had developed probable cause to believe you were driving under the influence (or while impaired by alcohol).
I hope that you see from my answer that everything in your case turns on whether or not the officer had sufficient probable cause to do what he or she did.
My advice: you need an experienced attorney to help you sort this out. Many attorneys, myself included, offer free initial consultations. I strongly urge you to take advantage of that and sit down with an attorney to discuss your options more fully.
Best of luck to you.
Under Colorado law, you do not have the right to consult with an attorney before being required to choose a blood test, breath test or to refuse testing because of suspicion of driving while impaired. Everything you did was voluntary and you did not have to take a test or perform roadside maneuvers, but you do not have a right to speak to an attorney before choosing.
You should consider hiring an attorney from CS - Tim Bussey, Robert Odle and Kent Gray are all good choices.
The Orr Law Firm, L.L.C Is Colorado's Premier DUI and Criminal Traffic Defense Law Firm. Rhidian Orr is the senior partner and owner of the firm and focuses his practice exclusively to DUI and criminal traffic matters in the state of Colorado. His decision to answer your questions does not constitute an attorney/client relationship.
DUI Testing blood alcohol level Field sobriety test for DUI Breathalyzer test for DUI Blood test for DUI Refusing a DUI test DUI charges DUI arrest Marijuana DUI Criminal defense Criminal charges Crimes against society Marijuana laws and criminal charges Miranda rights and criminal defense Probable cause and criminal defense Defenses for criminal charges Criminal arrest
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and legal advice about DUIs.