A juror cannot be punished for a verdict.
A judge will not instruct on nullification.
A judge tells them they must follow the law even if they don't agree with it. If they say they can't/won't, they can't sit as a juror.
Nullification should not be mentioned at any stage during the trial.
Joseph A. Lo Piccolo, Esq.
Past President, Criminal Courts Bar Association
Hession Bekoff & Lo Piccolo
1103 Stewart Ave, Suite 200
Garden City, NY 11530
516-408-3666 (o) / 516-408-3833 (f)
I am a criminal defense attorney practicing in Nassau, Suffolk and New York City. The above information is not a substitution for a meeting whereas all potential legal issues can be discussed.
I am not a NY lawyer but as a FL lawyer, and interpreting your question in regard to FL law, I'd have to tell you that you are way off the reservation.
Jury nullification is a term of art to used describe what happens where a jury disregards the law and does what it feels is right irrespective of what it knows to be lawful. It is a slap in the face to the law (specifically to the Legislature / Congress) and an affront to the judicial system. It is also a "necessary evil" as sometimes the law is the law but it is not "right".
Judges do not instruct on jury nullification, except to advise jurors that they are not lawfully entitled to do so (here in FL a standard jury instruction advises the jurors that the judge instructs them on the law, that they are to follow the law and that they are not to be guided by anything other than the law when they interpret, discuss and deliberate over the evidence). Maybe there is some quirky requirement in NY that Judges inform jurors of a "right to nullify" but I suspect not (for the reasons that I just stated).
Jurors enjoy privilege and protection when they serve. They can be held in contempt, even prosecuted, if they stray too far (for instance if they are caught lying during vior dire / questioning or if they accept a bribe or are caught researching or discussing the case when admonished not to do so), but as for nullification, no... that is their prerogative and, if done correctly the court would have no idea whether a jury had ignored the law or simply determined that the evidence was insufficient.
I suspect that NY follows FL (and most jurisdictions) in this regard. Below is a link to an article on jury nullification. I think I've covered it pretty well but maybe this will give you a little more information.
First, second and third: No attorney-client relationship exists by virtue of any Q&A with Michael A. Haber, Esq. on Avvo. Fourth: Anything that you post on Avvo (or on similar sites) or on any social media is by its nature public. It is essentially an admission / confession and can be introduced into evidence as a statement against your interest in a subsequent legal proceeding. Once posted you lose any reasonable expectation of privacy, so, as this is an open forum (with no privilege attached), please be extra careful when considering what to post online (forewarned is forearmed.)
A jury verdict is the most powerful aspect of a criminal law prosecution in this country. Prosecutors and defense attorneys have a role in the criminal justice system; the judge as presider of the law and trial process; but jurors are the finders of fact and vote in secret to return a verdict of Guilty or Not Guilty on each offense presented based on the evidence they heard and the governing law by a unanimous vote of 6/6 or 12/12, if they believe the evidence as to guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Jurors are to follow the law given to them by the judge.
I am trying to give you a general answer to your question. We do not have an attorney-client relationship by this response on the avvo website. I have not been retained to represent you. I am licensed to practice law in Kentucky and in federal court in this state and the Southern District of Indiana. You need to seek legal advice from an attorney licensed to practice in your area..
Jurors are usually charged must must.... if the prosecutor proves the case beyond a reasonable doubt they must convict. If the prosecutor failed to meet the burden of proof they must find not guilty. If they choose to nullify nothing can be done.
I am a former federal and State prosecutor and have been doing criminal defense work for over 16 years. I was named to the Super Lawyers list as one of the top attorneys in New York for 2012 and 2013. No more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state are selected by Super Lawyers. Martindale-Hubbell has given me its highest rating - AV Preeminent - in the areas of Criminal Law, Personal Injury, and Litigation. According to Martindale-Hubbell”AV Preeminent is a significant rating accomplishment - a testament to the fact that a lawyer's peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence." Fewer than 8% of attorneys achieve an AV Preeminent rating. I also have the highest ranking – “superb” – on Avvo. The above answer, and any follow up comments or emails is for informational purposes only and not meant as legal advice.
You should use traditional means of research for your school projects.
If you found this "helpful" or "best answer," please click it with my appreciation. My response is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice nor creates an attorney client relationship which requires all the details and a personal conference.