I was recently involved in a case where the police gathered evidence using a really sketchy search warrant and the prosecution tried to use this evidence before trial to try and scare the defendant into a plea bargain . The evidence was later thrown out because the warrant was invalid but I found it odd that the prosecution likely knew the warrant was invalid but yet they tried to intimidate the defendant with it anyways . How is this legal ? The defendant could have plead guilty to a crime that they would have otherwise been found not guilty because the evidence wasn't legit . How is this fair or even legal ?