True, a guardian and a trustee would have very different roles. In my opinion, it is the guardian who should most reflect your values, as it is she or he who would see to the children's education and well-being as they grow up if both parents were to die or become disabled (a very unlikely scenario). The trustee handles the money, perhaps well into the children's adulthood (depending on how you structure the trust). The trustee would have to provide the funds (and their investment) for the support of your children.
Outright hostility between trustee and guardian is one thing, but I would not be too concerned if there is merely a difference in approach or even values between the guardian and the trustee. Better to 1) choose a loving, supportive and wise guardian and 2) build the right safeguards into the trust. The trustee has an absolute fiduciary duty to carry out the requirements of the trust to the benefit of the beneficiaries regardless of his relationship with the guardian.
Note that a too-cozy relationship between trustee and guardian can work against the kids' benefit -- imagine if they were the same person, or husband and wife. Some arm's length between the guardian and the trustee can be positive between these two very different roles.
One caveat: I have been speaking generally, not specifically to your particular needs. You will need to get estate planning advice from a skilled estate planning attorney.
Best of luck!
learned people can disagree - but, I would think that having two people that are able to discuss issues and be nice for the benefit of the minor children is cheaper, more efficient and will serve the children's needs better. Perhaps one of those people is not a good idea.Ask a similar question
I agree with Attorney Groseclose. Since you already have indications that the people of choice do not get along, naming them in these respective capacities is a recipe for squabbling and strife. The need for agreement and cooperation is probably not great, but when you consider that the guardians, who are after all providing the day to day care of your children, would need to request funds and perhaps other assistance from people who are predisposed to being hostile to them, it would be an awkward arrangement, at best. I would think on this long and hard.
*** LEGAL DISCLAIMER I am licensed to practice law in the State of Michigan and have offices in Wayne and Ingham Counties. My practice is focused in the areas of estate planning and probate administration. I am ethically required to state that the above answer does not create an attorney/client relationship. These responses should be considered general legal education and are intended to provide general information about the question asked. Frequently, the question does not include important facts that, if known, could significantly change the answer. Information provided on this site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney that practices in your state. The law changes frequently and varies from state to state. If I refer to your state's laws, you should not rely on what I say; I just did a quick Internet search and found something that looked relevant that I hoped you would find helpful. You should verify and confirm any information provided with an attorney licensed in your state.Ask a similar question
My colleagues are correct. While there is no legal basis to preclude the two from the positions you are considering, you may want to reconsider. It would make life for your children less awkward and stressful if the guardian and trustees were congenial with one another. If you know there is hostility that exists between the two, it is likely to spillover into their roles in your children's lives. Just a point to consider.
When responding to questions posted on Avvo, I provide a general purpose response based on California law as I am licensed in California. In reviewing my response, you are specifically advised that your use of, or reliance upon any response I provide is not advisable. I do not have all relevant background details or facts related to your issue / matter, thus I am not in a position to give you legal advice. Further, your review, use of, or reliance upon my response does not establish an attorney-client relationship between us nor does it qualify as a legal consultation for any purpose. For specific advice regarding your particular circumstances, you should consult and retain local counsel.Ask a similar question