There are two ways that your Washington driving privileges could be affected by your non-action with regard to the California suspension.
The first is if Washington suspended you based on the California conviction. If Washington had been notified of the California conviction for reckless driving, it generally would have suspended you for 30 days. In order to be reinstated, you would have needed to show proof of SR-22 insurance, a condition that wold have lasted for three years. Based upn the age of the case and the fact that you renewed without incident in 2004 it is likely that a) Washington never received notice of the conviction or b) since Washington does not have a "wet reckless" statute, there was no basis for a Washington suspension. Regardless, the SR-22 requirement would have run its course by now.
The second way your Washington status could have been affected is if your license had remained suspended in California for failing to satisfy the SR-22 requirements down there. In general, however, the SR-22 requirement is only in affect for three years. Assuming a 2003 suspension for a period of one year on the refusal, that requirement wold have run in 2007.
In short, it is unlikely your renewal in 2009 will be affected. If you are concerned, call the Washington DOL to check on the staus of your driving privilege or check online at www.dol.wa.gov.
DUI DUI as a criminal offense Breathalyzer test for DUI DUI charges DUI arrest DUI and driver's license penalties DUI and suspended license License reinstatement after DUI SR22 license liability insurance Out of state DUI Criminal defense Criminal charges Crimes against society Defenses for criminal charges Criminal arrest Criminal court License suspension for traffic tickets
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and legal advice about DUIs.