If you have paid all of the payments on the car, and can demonstrate that, my position would be that you are the "equitable" or "beneficial" owner of the car, rather than your family member, and the family member is at best owner of 1/2 of the legal title only.
We have done many chapter 7's where essentially, one family member is allowing a second family member to use their credit, with the understanding being that once the vehicle is paid for, title will be transferred to the party that paid for it.
If this is what happened, I do not forsee one of our bankruptcy judges here in Houston making you surrender the car to a Chapter 7 Trustee, if you paid for it and the intent of the parties was that you were to be the owner once the vehicle was paid. I have not even had a trustee try it, in a case like this.
But if in fact you are co-owners, and the agreement with the family member was that they remain so even after the car is paid off, and the car cannot be claimed as exempt, you still may be able to convince the trustee to abandon it if you claim that you should be reimbursed for at least part of the payments made on the car.
Worst case, you can probably arrange with the trustee to buy the family members's share of the car back from the trustee.
We are a debt relief agency and we help people file for relief under the bankruptcy laws.
I would suggest that you discuss this issue with the family member because the exemptions s/he selects will determine what the Trustee may try to take. I am posting a link to a description of the exemptions available in all 50 US states for you to review. When calculating equity, remember to take FMV and subtract the loan balance, then divide in half. Hope this perspective helps!
There are a few issues here. First, if you and the family member are 50/50 titled owners of the car, then the bankruptcy estate only has an interest in 50% of the vehicle. Second, without knowing the value of the vehicle (KBB trade-in value is what I normally use), there is no way to know if your relative's bankruptcy can exempt their share (50% total value minus 50% of the outstanding lien) or not. If not, then their non-share is property of the bankruptcy trustee, and to keep the car, it would have to be traded for an equal amount of case paid into the bankruptcy estate. The other issue is this - YOU don't own the car; you own 50% of the car. The bankruptcy isn't going to give you total title to the car regardless of the resolution of the estate's interest in your relative's ownership.
We can be reached at 507.334.0155 (Toll Free: 888.777.5009). Our web address is: www. corbin-law-office.com. Answers on Avvo are not to be considered a response to a specific legal issue in a specific jurisdiction - they are to be considered only general responses to hypothetical scenarios posed by the questioner. For specific legal advice, please consult with a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. No information contained herein should be construed as a solicitation for business, an offer to perform legal services in any jurisdiction in which the attorneys of Corbin Law Office are not licensed, or the dissemination of legal advice. No creation of an attorney-client relationship should be assumed or implied. We are a debt relief agency. Corbin Law Office helps people file for bankruptcy relief under the bankruptcy code.
I don't know what the exemption amount is for a car in Texas, but it sounds like there is a lot of equity in it. YOU should call a bankruptcy attorney. Good luck.
Be sure to designate "best answer." If you live in Oregon, you may call me for more detailed advice, 503-650-9662. Please be aware that each answer on this website is based upon the facts, or lack thereof, provided in the question. To be sure you get complete and comprehensive answers, based upon the totality of your situation, contact a local attorney who specializes in the area of law that involves your legal problem. Diane L. Gruber has been practicing law in Oregon for 26 years, specializing in family law, bankruptcy, estate planning and probate. Note: Diane L. Gruber does not represent you until a written fee agreement has been signed by you and Diane L. Gruber, and the fee listed in the agreement has been paid.
First thing is to check the actual title to car. But I bet that you do not have the actual title available because the financier of the car is holding the title. So, find the "memorandum title" or what ever you call the buyers' record of title in Texas. It should be with the original purchase documents for the car. See what names are really on the title. And before you ask, there's no way that the Bankruptcy Court will recognize your ownership of the car, unless you are on the title. I suspect that you could be a co-signor on the loan and NOT on the title. Being on the loan does not help to show any ownership interest. You need to be on the tile to be an owner.
But, calm down a little. This car probably has more owed on it than it's worth. That's GOOD news. Nobody wants such a car. The Trustee can't sell it and make any money. And the lender would much prefer to keep on taking payments as long as the car is fully insured. So, keep making the payments on time and keep it insured. Things will probably be OK, if the car is overliened like I think it is. Good luck.
This answer is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship and may not be relied upon as legal advice. A careful examination of the facts is necessary before a legal answer may be relied on. You should consult your own attorney before taking or refraining from any legal action.
At least in the Dallas area, the Trustees here look in the case of co-titled cars at who has been making the payments. There is a "constructive trust" or "resulting trust" argument that says that the person paying for the car is the one truly entitled to own the car. So, Chapter 7 trustees in the situation you describe would not go after the car because the debtor does not have any real ownership in it. But, I recommend that you visit with a bankruptcy attorney in the Houston area.
I am licensed only in Texas. Offering information of a general nature in response to a question is not intended to be legal advice in your state.