A judge started in her “findings of Fact “ the defendant’s testimony re: (issue) “was not credible”. However after I scrutinized the transcripts there was simply NO testimony by the defendant on said issue at all. We filed the Appeal brief , received response and am typing the reply brief. I am having a hard time expressing this is a MAJOR, CLEAR error. How can someone be found not credible based on something that never happened????
Years licensed, work experience, educationLegal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awardsLegal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagementsDiscipline