How many lawyers have you contacted? Maybe you have not contacted the right lawyer yet? It is difficult to ask the general public why specific lawyers have declined the case. The question would be best posed to the lawyers that have declined it. There are many reasons lawyers decline cases and it is unclear what their reasons are. Good luck.
You should consult an attorney in your State at once. Visit our webpage and tell us what you think. www.schnitzerlaw.net
I am sorry to hear about you and your wife's situation. I suggest contacting the Florida Bar Lawyer Referral Service. They should be able to assist you in obtaining a medical malpractice attorney in your area. I have provided the link for you below. Good luck.
Pursuant to AVVO community policies and guidelines, the content of this post is intended for informational purposes only. It should not be considered legal advice and does not form an attorney-client relationship. Therefore, it should not be relied upon to take or refrain from taking any legal action without first seeking the advise from an independent licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. This post also does not intend to solicit business and may be considered attorney advertisement in some jurisdictions. Statements of prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Stefano V. D'Agostino, Esq., is license to practice only in Massachusetts.
There is a very logical explanation for your concededly accurate observation that it is much more difficult at the present time to find the kind of Medical Malpractice attorney, which is to say one who has a great deal of experience with medical malpractice litigation; has a great deal of jury trial experience, as most medical malpractice actions ultimately are resolved by presenting the allegations to a jury, which is not at all true of any other variety of tort claim (in fact, it is unique among all other actions of literally every other sort, as the probability that a matter will be resolved via formal or informal settlement processes is somewhere between 90% and 97%, depending upon which specific form of action has been formally filed as a Complaint for Damages in the Civil Division of a given County's Courthouse. Therefore, one can truly say that the evaluation of a medical malpractice claim must by necessity be accomplished, from literally the very start, with predicate assumptions which are the antitheses of those characteristic of every other action. That is no doubt incredibly difficult for a layperson to believe but it is absolutely true and I could fill a book with the reasons which underlie plain and simple truth. Unfortunately for everyone concerned, but for the doctors, hospitals, acute care facilities; certain other medical providers, AND, WITH ALMOST NO DOUBT THE MOST SIGNIFICANT BENEFICIARY OF THIS INCREDIBLE SERIES OF UNLIKELY OUTCOMES, EACH BOOTSTRAPPED UPON THE OTHER, STRAINING AT THE PRESSURE IMPOSED BY THE INCREASING DOUBT OF THE FACTS WITH WHICH THE PUBLIC WAS SYSTEMATICALLY, CONTINUOUSLY AND DIZZYINGLY BARRAGED, YET REMARKABLY NEVER IN THE END YIELDING TO LOGIC AND REASON, OR THE FACTS, FOR THAT MATTER, ALL OF THE ABOVE WERE DELIGHTED WHEN THEIR COLLECTIVE DREAMS CAME TRUE, ........LAST, BUT IN NO WAY THE LEAST, IN FACT PROBABLY THE GREATESTS BENEFICIARY OF ALL OF THE LEGISLATION THAT WAS SET IN PLACE TO AUGMENT ALL OF THE ALREADY EXISTING LEGISLATION TO PREVENT A DISASTER THAT WAS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN (MORE ON THAT IN A MINUTE)....THE MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LIABILITY INSURANCE INDUSTRY. TA-DA!!!!!!
We are pleased to offer a free thirty (30) minute initial telephone consultation, or, if possible, will attempt to schedule a free thirty (30) minute initial office consultation. Neither this offer of a free initial consultation, nor the mere fact that the initial consultation may have ultimately been conducted, whether telephonically or at our office location, should be construed; assumed; interpreted; or understood by any individual who was granted a free initial consultation for which no consideration of any sort whatsoever was tendered, to have formed or created an attorney-client relationship, or to have created any obligations owed by the attorney or attorney's firm to any individual who was given a free initial consultation, by the mere undertaking of the free initial consultation for which no consideration of any sort was tendered to attorney or attorney's firm. The formation of an attorney-client relationship occurs through the process of negotiation between the prospective parties, the individual seeking legal representation, and the attorney, acting individually, or as an agent of a firm (the capacity in which the attorney is acting shall be disclosed to prospective client, if negotiations for legal representation in exchange for good and valuable consideration are undertaken by the prospective client and the attorney. If agreement is reached by and between the parties for legal representation after the mutually satisfactory negotiation of the agreement for legal representation, and all of its individual terms; the scope of representation to be provided by the attorney to the prospective client has been delineated to the mutual satisfaction of the parties; the manner of payment of good and valuable consideration by the prospective client to the attorney has been determined; and it has been conceded by the parties that all of those factors upon which agreement had been reached by the parties and which were recited herein, had been agreed upon by the parties only after careful consideration and sufficient review of the document styled Agreement for Legal Representation, and after it has likewise been conceded by the parties that each respectively had been presented with the opportunity to have the document reviewed independently by each respective party's personal attorney, or any other attorney of his or her chooosing. If the Agreement for Legal Representation contains terms regarding contingency fee agreement or agreements for payment to the attorney for all or a portion of his or her services and legal representation on behalf of the Client, Client concedes that he or she has been presented with an additional document entitled "Statement of Client's Rights", which is a document created by the Florida Bar and approved for use in matters in which payment in full or part, is tendered by contingency fee agreement. Please note that any commentary or response offered through this site is based on the limited set of facts and background data supplied by the individual framing the question and would in all likelihood require more investigation before a complete response could properly be framed to thoroughly answer the question posed. No attorney-client relationship is, or should be presumed to be, formed through the comments or responses provided to the individual posing the question, as a courtesy, here, through this forum, nor should any other duties or obligations be construed; assumed; or otherwise be inferred to exist and/or owed to the individual who posed the question by the attorney who provided the best guidance possible to said individual under the circumstances presented as they were, including the unreasonable assumption that a full and thorough legal analysis of an individual's situation could be formulated simply based on the minute portion of the entirety of the facts and circumstances surrounding any legal matter, which could in no manner possibly be presented here in such a form which would allow for a thorough analysis, evaluation, or legal opinion to be formed by the Attorney.
When an attorney responds to a question, Avvo sends the answer to all the other attorneys who answered before him/her, so this response is directed as much to the attorneys who are out of state who responded as to you. And by the way, I do not do personal injury, so what I am saying is not a result of having my practice impacted.
The reason it is difficult to have a medical malpractice attorney take on a case is......as suggested by Mr. Dohner in Hallandale, Fl: the insurance industry, which with the banking industry just about owns the legislature, influenced the legislators to put up for vote a constitutional amendment that would limit non-economic damages--pain and suffering and loss of quality of life--to $250,000.00, promising that medical malpractice insurance premiums would be reduced, thereby enabling health care providers to have protection with lower costs.
Since the cost to prosecute a med/mal case is enormous, a lawyer taking on a case is looking at a limited attorney's fee after having spent an enormous amount of time in the case.. And after the lawyer has spent an enormous of money to prosecute the case. Before the law suit is filed, the lawyer will have paid his/her own consultants fees to review a massive amount of medical records [paid for by the lawyer] to determine whether the health care provider failed to meet its level of appropriate care.
As my colleague from Hallandale pointed out, unlike auto accidents and other types of tort cases which for the most part are settled without trial, medical malpractice cases typically do not settle before trial. That means even more expense. Charts. Expert witnesses testifying. Depositions being transcribed. Perhaps having a shadow jury observing. Investigations. Etc Etc Etc.
And there are plenty of times that a jury will decide against the patient. So, the lawyer will have invested a lot of his/her money, not to mention his/her time and the resources of his/her office, with a strong possibility that all will have been wasted.
So, many attorneys will pass on cases that are good ones but which are not rock solid. I once tried to get a lawyer to take a case for a friend of mine. Absolutely clear that his condition was worsened by a misdiagnosis. He dropped from 195 lbs to 85. It took 10 days for the medical folks to realize his spleen had ruptured. He had to rehab. He lost his job. It took him a long time to get back to what he had been. Here was the problem: he rehabbed and recovered so well that you could not tell by looking at him that he was just this far from death. So, he did not make for a good "victim". Over 12 attorneys passed on his case.
BTW--the insurance premium reduction for doctors? Never happened. Just like the PIP insurance just going to effect 10/1/12 to reduce fraud and lower premiums by limiting medical coverage and limiting the amount of time within which someone in an auto accident had to seek medical care. Of the rate changes submitted by insurers this month, most were for rate INCREASES, not reductions.
I hope you found this response to be of assistance. This response shall not be considered the rendering of legal advise but instead a general response to a general question. While Avvo is a wonderful resource, nothing can be a substitute for an in-depth consultation with an attorney in the jurisdiction in which the law is to be applied. This response shall not be deemed to create an attorney-client relationship, nor shall it create an obligation on the part of the attorney to respond to further inquiry from the questioner.
I believe this is a companion question to one your wife posted a little later. Her injuries are severe enough to interest a medical malpractice lawyer in investigating the case. The fact that three lawyers turned the case down doesn't mean much. You may be talking to the wrong lawyers. You need somebody with real expertise in the field. Keep trying. If you can't find somebody good who is willing to look at the case, contact me off list and I can make a couple of recommendations. I can't guarantee that you will find a lawyer who will take the case, but you owe it to yourselves to consult with a lawyer who knows what he or she is doing.
Any opinions stated in response to Avvo questions are based upon the facts stated in the question. Responses to Avvo questions are for general information purposes only, and should not be construed or relied upon as legal advice.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.