I read somewhere that there have been cal supreme court cases that contain confirmation of the intent of traffic enforcement laws. Specifically that police should patrol for traffic enforcement and use radar only as a secondary measure for verification. The language I recall was something like " the legislatures intent was to strongly discourage the use of stationary radar in favor of vigorous patrolling for public safety " or something like that. More importantly can you see any opportunity to use this intent and the language as cited in these cases in defense of 22549a excessive speed issued by a stationary radar? I know this may be reaching but I thought it might be icing on the cake so to speak.