You would be an officer in your corp., and officers are required to be paid salary under current tax law. Typically, in your situation, you would be required to have some form of written deferred compensation agreement with minutes approviing the agreement. Incoporating also creates additional costs and fees which you need to determine if you can afford.
THESE COMMENTS ARE NOT LEGAL ADVICE. They are provided for informational purposes only. Actual legal advice can only be provided after consultation by an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. The answer to question does not create an attorney-client relationship or otherwise require further consultation. Mr. Smith is licensed to practice law throughout the state of California with offices in Los Angeles County. He is authorized to handle IRS matters throughout the United States, and is also licensed to practice before the United States Tax Court. His phone number is 323-292-4116 or his email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.Ask a similar question
There are ways that you can structure your business in a format that you can have the business as a corp invest in your own business and hire people without eventually create issues in the future with IRS and other agencies.
A lawyer that knows not only how to structure a corp and adjust your present entity can assist you and give you viable and economical solutions for your issue.
Your present legal entity and documents in reference to your issues must be reviewed in order to have a viable and beneficial solution
Disclaimer:Attorney and Fraud Examiner.One of few that are Certified Fraud Examiners (CFE). The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as a legal advice on any subject. No recipients of content from this site,clients or otherwise,should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient's state. The content of this website contains general information and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. The Karamanlis Powers Law Offices expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this website, weblogs, twitter, facebook, google+. *the certification is not a specialty recognized by the California State Bar.Ask a similar question
Mr. Phillips gives his customarily great answer.
I would add, before creating an entity, make sure a CPA is also on your team to discuss tax issues (unless you are lucky to find someone like Mr. Phillips who adds tax analysis.) Setting up your company online to "save a few bucks" is an error. You will not issue your shares correctly (or membership interests if you determine that an LLC is less advantageous) you will probably not observe corporate formalities, and you won't have someone who knows you and your business to discuss the many law related questions that frequenly arise.
Good luck in you venture.
The above is general legal and business analysis. It is not "legal advice" but analysis, and different lawyers may analyse this matter differently, especially if there are additional facts not reflected in the question. I am not your attorney until retained by a written retainer agreement signed by both of us. I am only licensed in California. See also avvo.com terms and conditions item 9, incorporated as if it was reprinted here.Ask a similar question
I have to respectfully disagree with my colleague. In the eyes of the IRS, an officer of a corporation is generally an employee, but an officer who performs no services or only minor services, and who neither receives nor is entitled to receive any pay, is not considered an employee. Refer to "Who Are Employees?" in Publication 15-A, Employer's Supplemental Tax Guide (PDF).
In the eyes of the California EDD, corporate officers are considered "statutory employees." This typically comes into play when an officer is trying to avoid payroll taxes and be paid by the corporation as an independent contractor - thus, the EDD had nipped that temptation in the bud.
Further, it is my understanding that the "paying a reasonable wage" requirement is primarily, if not exclusively, for "S" corporations who have chosen to make distributions to their shareholders (owners) or other provide other benefits in lieu of wages - again, primarily to avoid paying employment and payroll taxes.
The information that has been provided on this website, including information contained in any link or informational reference, does not – and shall not be considered to – constitute legal or professional advice. The reader should not consider such information to be an invitation for an attorney-client relationship, should neither act nor rely on such information, and should always seek the advice of competent counsel licensed in the reader's state. Attorneys with the For Purpose Law Group are generally licensed to practice law only in the State of California. The ability of the reader to access this website in another jurisdiction does not constitute the practice of law outside of California, or a representation that members of the For Purpose Law Group are licensed to practice in any other jurisdiction. This site is not intended to, nor does it establish an attorney / client relationship between you and this office.Ask a similar question