If you want the expert to provide a declaration in lieu of testimony at trial, you are not likely to get it in. The defense has the right to cross examine the expert.
The general rule is that a witness must appear and be subject to cross-examination. A declaration would in all likelihood be excluded as hearsay. I have tried cases before judges (not jury trials) where the judge permits the declaration filed under the penalties of perjury to serve in lieu of direct examination to conserve time but the expert must be made available for cross-examination.
The Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct require that Ken DeMoura's AVVO attorney-profile and any response or information provided by Ken DeMoura on the AVVO website be labeled ADVERTISING. This is not a solicitation for legal business. The information provided here is not legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is created between the reader and Ken DeMoura or DeMoura|Smith LLP through this information, response or profile. An attorney-client relationship will only be created when Ken DeMoura and DeMoura|Smith LLP agrees to an engagement in a written and signed engagment letter.
Depends upon the court. Small claims yes. Economic litigation if the rules are followed, yes. Superior court normal rules, no, unless the parties agree.
If you are talking about trial, then as previous answers have suggested, it is unlikely that a declaration would be sufficient. But there are other circumstances where expert declarations are allowed, such as on a summary judgment motion. If you are dealing with an expert declaration in that context, you might need to take the expert's deposition and offer some transcript excerpts in opposition or you might need to hire your own expert to raise an issue of fact.