You should repost this question in the family law section.
My comments are provided for general information purposes only. Nothing on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, emails, or other communications through Avvo should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Lawyers are licensed to practice on a state by state basis; do not act on information contained on this website without first speaking to an attorney licensed to practice in your state.
No, there is not. And even if you could, it's unlikely that those expenses would be "charged" against your spouse in a divorce occurring nearly 15 years after most of those events -- and 6 years after the most recent. Kansas courts decide how to "equitably divide" property in a marriage at divorce. And, yes, in some circumstances the courts can consider that a party should receive more or less because of "dissipation of assets." Most judges, however, would say that if you didn't want to expend moneys in that way, you could have easily filed for divorce then -- instead of asking now to be "reimbursed."
Make an appointment with a qualified family lawyer to find out about your rights and whether in your situation any recovery is possible. Only by doing so can any lawyer give good advice about individual situations.
This response does not constitute legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. I am licensed to practice only in Kansas. Seek legal advice from an attorney in your state or the state in which your legal claim exists.