It's a valid defense however you're witnesses are going to have to testify at trail and at your DMV hearing. With a refusal issue you have no choice, since you are looking at a one year drivers license suspension. You are absolutely going o need your own counsel. start checking around now, you have to get that DMV hearing booked.
There are various instances under California law where an officer does not need to personally observe driving pursuant to VC 40300.5. Exceptions include (a) The person is involved in a traffic accident, (b) The person is observed in or about a vehicle that is obstructing a roadway, (c) The person will not be apprehended unless immediately arrested, (d) The person may cause injury to himself or herself or damage property unless immediately arrested, (e) The person may destroy or conceal evidence of the crime unless immediately arrested.
You should not post any more facts here since it is a public forum. What you should do is consult an experienced DUI attorney in your area to look into defenses as it relates to the DMV administrative suspension issue and the criminal case. If you do not set a DMV APS hearing within 10 days of the incident and you were given a pink temporary license with the check boxes for .08 BAC and refusal, you will lose your license for at least 1 year.
You should consult an attorney ASAP. Most attorneys will give a free consult.
As you are aware the DMV will take your license for a year and you will have increased punishment if found guilty in court. It is time to hire an attorney. You did not do yourself any favors by refusing the evidential test. You will not solve this by yourself.
Mr. Driessen is a former Deputy DA in Orange County with over 8 years of criminal law experience. Nothing stated on this site shall in anyway be construed as legal advice, or as creating any attorney client relationship. If you would like to hire Mr. Driessen, feel free to contact him at www.theocduiguy.com.
If the cop had probable cause to arrest you for DUI, and did arrest you, and gave you a choice of blood or breath test, and you refused, then a refusal is a refusal. Get counsel [there are many people proficient in DUI law in your area], and post no more in public.
Will it be a defense at the DMV hearing that you were not driving? It would not be in Wisconsin. You have mixed answers from fine California lawyers. In both, though, lack of probable cause for the arrest would be a defense. This is not a defense that makes itself. DUI defense in not a good do-it-yourself project.
Often people think that because it isn’t a murder case, a drunk driving case is simple. Nothing could be further from the truth. These cases can be among the most complex a criminal defense lawyer handles. The government is willing to spend an incredible amount of money to convict you though. They will have expert witnesses available for consultation and trial.
That you have been charged or that some contraption says your alcohol level was at a certain level does not mean that you are guilty. It certainly does not mean that you can be proven guilty using competent, valid evidence.
Field sobriety “tests” are designed to give police a reason to arrest. You cannot “pass” them. The police will admit that almost a third of healthy young adults who take these tests without any alcohol will be judged to be “under the influence” – and that assumes they are properly administered!
After even a first drunk driving conviction, you may face employment discrimination. You will certainly be charged higher for insurance. Having such a conviction will also make you a target for drunk driving arrest in future interactions with police. You will automatically become a suspect.
You will want a lawyer who is familiar with field sobriety “tests,” perhaps one who is certified to administer these tests. You will want a lawyer familiar with the weaknesses of the contraptions that are used to report alcohol or drug levels. You want an experienced trial lawyer, used to cross-examining police officers. Police officers are practiced, experienced witnesses.
That is, you want an experienced drunk driving defense lawyer, whether you call the offense DUI, OWI, DWI, OUI, or drugged driving.
If any answer on AVVO helps you, mine or someone else’s, please mark it as "helpful" or "best answer" to help AVVO know which answers to show others.
--- Experienced DUI/DWI/OWI/Drunk Driving Lawyer in Madison, Wisconsin
--- Facebook Page Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin Drunk Driving / OWI / DWI / DUI Lawyer
--- Field sobriety "tests" – Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin DUI / DWI / OWI / Drunk Driving lawyer
--- Drugged Driving/DUI/DWI/Drunk Driving with Prescription Drugs – Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin
--- Which Offenses Count as Priors in Wisconsin? - Madison Dane County Wisconsin DUI OWI Drunk Driving Lawyer answers
--- Ten Days to Save Your License - Administrative Suspension and Refusals in Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin
Confidential information should not be disclosed in this Internet forum.
I am an experienced Wisconsin drunk driving (DUI/OWI/DWI) defense lawyer practicing in Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin. The laws in each jurisdiction can be very different. I cannot give legal advice over the Internet nor can I establish an attorney client relationship with you.
If something I say disagrees with what your own lawyer is telling you, you should rely on your lawyer who is familiar with you, your entire case, the local courts and practices.
To deal with a legal problem, nothing is better than to consult with a lawyer who will give you some time and advice. If you cannot afford an attorney, there should be agencies in your area that can provide discounted, or even free, legal services.
This AVVO Answer is provided for general educational purposes only.
See “more” link below for more important information about this answer and AVVO.
Confidential information should not be disclosed in this Internet forum. Click on the "More..." link for IMPORTANT INFORMATION about this AVVO Answer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I am an experienced Wisconsin lawyer. The laws in each jurisdiction can be very different. I cannot give legal advice over the internet nor can I establish an attorney client relationship with you. You should NOT assume or otherwise conclude that there is an attorney -client relationship between any reader and this writer or his firm. These comments are only guideposts. They are not subject to any privilege protections. Indeed, these internet communications are neither privileged nor confidential. Accordingly, those using this form of communication need to be guarded in what they write. Because of the nature of these communications the information is general only and should not be relied upon in any specific case. This internet site is public forum, where the communications are not confidential or privileged. There may very well be merit to your defense or position in this type of situation. However, there are hardly sufficient details for an attorney to provide you with some path to follow. It is imperative that ALL of the facts in a particular situation be examined. No conclusion can be drawn from the communication that you have provided. There are some matters that are just better handled by an attorney familiar with the procedures of the courts in your area. Most, if not all, legal matters should not be handled via internet communication. At best, the responders on this site can give you a few hints and guidance. To deal with a legal problem, nothing is better than to consult with a lawyer who will give you some time and advice. If you cannot afford an attorney, there should be agencies in your area that can provide discounted, or even free, legal services. For a definitive answer you should seek legal advice from an attorney who (1) is licensed to practice in the state which has jurisdiction; (2) has experience in the area of law you are asking about, and (3) has been retained as your attorney for representation or consultation. Your question and the attorney’s answer may be used for promotional or educational purposes.
This is as good as it gets as far as a defensible DUI. You have learned the hard way that guess what, cops lie. All the time. You obviously can contest and have to contest the suspension. Hire local counsel and then if the City Attorney files it you have an excellent defense. I have gotten excellent results on facts like these in Van Nuys. Call if you need a consult.
There are many defenses available, however you need an attorney to review all the relevent facts before a legal opinion can be made.
DUI DUI defense Admissibility of standardized field sobriety tests DUI as a criminal offense Testing blood alcohol level Field sobriety test for DUI Blood test for DUI Refusing a DUI test DUI trial DUI and DMV hearings DUI charges DUI arrest DUI and driver's license penalties DUI and civil lawsuits DUI and employment consequences Driving under the influence of drugs Criminal defense Civil penalties for DUI Criminal charges Crimes against society Criminal charges for murder Probable cause and criminal defense Defenses for criminal charges Criminal arrest Criminal court Admissible evidence in criminal cases Employment Violent crime Discrimination in the workplace Government law Lawsuits and disputes Discrimination
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and legal advice about DUIs.