I used a product which is unfit to be used because such product contains hazardous chemicals that caused me an injury. I have a cause of action under the uniform commercial code which has a four year statute of limitations. The company failed to provide proper label warnings while their competitors have proper warning labels of foreseeable risks on same similar product. Both products contain same chemicals. My understanding from my research is that an implied warranty is a contract. Also, my research indicates to me that damages arising from the breach of a contract is ordinarily limited to the contract damages necessary to redress the private wrong, but that punitive damages may be recoverable if necessary to vindicate a public right. The product is on all store shelves. The company has engaged in gross and morally reprehensible and of such wanton dishonesty as to imply a criminal indifference to civil obligations.
I am of the opininion that this is not a "breach of impilied warranty" claim, so much as it would be a "failure to warn" claim. In the scenario you provide, and without knowing more (ie- how the product injured you and what injuries you suffered) it would be stil unlikely that you would succeed in getting punitive damages, unless you could prove, for example, that there were numerous other incidents of identical injuries under identical circumstances that the company new about and still did not intentionally provide a proper warning. By your indication, there are similar products on the market, made of the same chemicals, it just that this one did not give as good a warning as the others. Even then, this is not a scenario inlvovlng a defective product from the standpoint of its manufacture. As an aside, strict product liability cases, even ones based upon a failure to warn or even breach of warranty, are very expensive to litigate and only worth the effort, so to speak, if the injury is significant and permanent.
As a general rule, the UCC does not provide for punitive damages and NY courts are generally not in favor of punitive awards in contract settings. Breach of implied waranty claims ofen sound in strict products liability, a tort based claim for which punitive damages may be available. This area of the law is somewhat sophisticated and you should really have an attorney familiar with NY products claims on your side before proceeding further.
Disclaimer- The information you obtain at our web-site or through postings on such sites as this is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for specific advice regarding your individual situation. Any response given here is not intended to create, nor does it create an ongoing duty to respond to questions. The response does not form an attorney-client relationship, nor is it intended to be relied upon as legal advice. The response given is based upon the limited facts provided by the person asking the question. To the extent additional or different facts exist, the response may change appropriately.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.
Years licensed, work experience, educationLegal community recognition
Peer endorsements, associations, awardsLegal thought leadership
Publications, speaking engagementsDiscipline