Skip to main content

Does Consumer Credit Protection Act wording - 15 USC § 1677 - Effect on State laws mean that State garnishment laws MUST prevail

Orlando, FL |

It seems to indicate so on the website in the CCPA. Here is the specific URL to it It even says on this page, "If a state wage garnishment law differs from Title III, the employer must observe the law resulting in the smaller garnishment"

So logically, if I have a judgment against me for federal educational debt (student loans - but NOT TAXES - which are the only two debts that the CCPA lists as excluded in its scope of coverage),... if I have a judgment against me here in FL, and FL garnishment law allows me to claim head of household exemption to be 100% exempt from wage garnishment, then does this mean the judgment creditor (US Govt) is bound to uphold its own Federal CCPA law, which says it MUST observe state law's protection?

+ Read More

Attorney answers 2


You need only post your question once.


Duplicate post.

R. Jason de Groot, Esq.,

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer