I know of no law clerk in the superior court who does not have a law degree.
Your perception about judges or clerks not reading pleadings, motions or exhibits is incorrect. Further, motions have hearing dates providing for oral argument, so anything one feels was overlooked can be brought directly to the attention of the judge.
Litigants who lose "cases" always have the option of the court of appeals.
The above is general legal and business analysis. It is not "legal advice" but analysis, and different lawyers may analyse this matter differently, especially if there are additional facts not reflected in the question. I am not your attorney until retained by a written retainer agreement signed by both of us. I am only licensed in California. See also avvo.com terms and conditions item 9, incorporated as if it was reprinted here.
Generally speaking, the law clerks do have law degrees. I think you have a misconception that the judges do not take the time or effort to read legal motions before them. I have the exact opposite opinion. I find that judges work extremely hard to read all documents submitted to them.
None of the information on this site constitutes legal advice. It is an ad for attorney services. The attorneys at DeDecker & Meltzer are licensed attorneys in the state of California. The information is intended to be general in nature as there are many laws and regulations not mentioned on this site that may apply to your situation. No attorney-client relationship is created between you and the Law Office of DeDecker & Meltzer unless a signed written fee agreement exists. You should not rely or act upon the information provided on this site without seeking the advice from an attorney.
My experience told me that the Judges know the case very well, although sometimes they made mistake. Under most circumstances, both the winner and loser of a case can appeal the judge's decision.
It has been some time since most Superior Court judges had the luxury of a law clerk, in my experience. But your question raises a significant point, one that the pro pers who seek practice advice here would be well-served to embrace: the court has no time or energy to wade through non-critical matter in any filing. There is no time whatsoever for rants about the perjury of the other side, long involved summaries of the parties' history, explanations of one's laudatory motives, etc. In any document filed with the court, the writer must early and straight-forwardly the critical issue and the moving party's contention of the legal position.
My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as legal advice. I give legal advice only in the course of an attorney-client relationship. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me. That relationship is established only by individual consultation and execution of a written agreement for legal services.