Yes, it is possible. CA Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivisions (h) and (i) provide as follows:
" (h) If it appears from the affidavits submitted in opposition to a
motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication or both that
facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot, for
reasons stated, then be presented, the court shall deny the motion,
or order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or
discovery to be had or may make any other order as may be just. The
application to continue the motion to obtain necessary discovery may
also be made by ex parte motion at any time on or before the date the
opposition response to the motion is due.
(i) If, after granting a continuance to allow specified additional
discovery, the court determines that the party seeking summary
judgment has unreasonably failed to allow the discovery to be
conducted, the court shall grant a continuance to permit the
discovery to go forward or deny the motion for summary judgment or
summary adjudication. This section does not affect or limit the
ability of any party to compel discovery under the Civil Discovery
Act (Title 4 (commencing with Section 2016.010) of Part 4)."
But note that because the motion for summary judgment requires at least 75 days notice, you ought to be able to conduct discovery within that time period to obtain the necessary evidence needed to defeat the MSJ.
Frank W. Chen has been licensed to practice law in California since 1988. The information presented here is general in nature and is not intended, nor should be construed, as legal advice for a particular case. This Avvo.com posting does not create any attorney-client relationship with the author. For specific advice about your particular situation, please consult with your own attorney.
You can absolutely request a continuance of the summary judgment motion. This is especially true if the other side (the party bringing the motion) has not been cooperative with discovery. You also need to show that you have acted diligently in attempting to obtain discovery. If you have not already done so, you should consider filing motions to compel the discovery that is not been responded to.
I agree with my esteemed colleague Mr. Chen. additionally, you state that the judge is " biased" because he hasn't done anything about you not receiving discovery responses. however, the burden us on you to first " meet and confer" with opposing counsel regarding the adequacy of discovery responses and then, if need be, to file a motion to compel responses.
The opinions published on this forum should not be construed as creating an attorney-client relationship for any purpose, and is intended only for providing informal preliminary information to a legal inquiry. Victor Look - 818-444-1779
EX parte motions are only approptiate for certain matters. They are not for motions to compel discovery. I dont know your court procedures, but it is not unusual for it to take 6 weeks to get a hearing calendared for a motion to compel. With the reqd deadlines for serving the motion, opposing, and replying, you usually need to start with a court date about 30 days away. if you have already pissed off the judge for not following the proper procedures, you better start doing so. Just because you are not a lawyer doesnt mean the court has to cut you slack on the rules. This is why it is hard to represent yourself. Consider hiring a lawyer.