In California, you have a deadline if 2 years to either settle or file suit to preserve your personal injury claim. They sent you a letter in advance telling you that. During those 2 years you never once consulted a lawyer? Sorry, "they" didnt "drag it out," you did. If you were still treating and not ready to settle, you should have filed a lawsuit. If you didnt like the offers made, you should have filed a lawsuit. If you blew the 2 year deadline, that's it. You can try consulting an attorney to review this, but they sent you notice of the deadline in advance and then you never followed up. They dont have any obligation to hold your hand and keep reminding you if the deadline. it was yout responsibility to keep an eye on that deadline. I don't see any recourse on this one.
This response is intended solely as general information, not as legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.
If the statute has run, you're out of luck. However, whether or not the SOL has run is a question of fact and you may have defenses. If this is your insurance company, as opposed to the carrier for the other party, you may have additional rights in contract. Bottom line: You need to pay for a consultation with an attorney who can review the facts, including the correspondence between you and the insurance company, to determine if the statute has run. Good luck.
SINCE 1974. My answers are for general information only. They are not legal advice. Answers assume California law. I am licensed in California, only. Answers must not be relied upon.<br> <br> Legal advice and counsel must be based on the interplay between specific exact facts and the law. This forum does not allow for the discussion of that interplay. My answer to any specific question would likely be different if that interplay were explored during an attorney-client relationship. <br> <br> I provide legal advice and counsel during the course of an attorney-client relationship only. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such a relationship. That relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement signed by each of us.<br> <br> The communications on this website are not privileged or confidential. I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo because I have answered or commented on a question. Specifically, I assume no duty to respond to any question, comment, telephone call, or email because of my participation.<br> <br> All legal proceedings involve deadlines and time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take appropriate action and because I do not provide legal advice or counsel in answer to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult an attorney licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction for advice and counsel. See, also, Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference.<br>
This is one of the reasons why you constantly hear lawyers tell the public to consult a lawyer immediately following an accident. The insurance company is hard at work to minimize your claim (and increase its profits). You (and the public) need someone who is looking out for your interest. The insurance company's incentives to "help" you is only motivated by certain legal requirements under California law. In your situation, the insurance company was only required to send you one notice informing you that you must file a lawsuit within two (2) years from the date of the collision for personal injuries and three (3) years for property damage. There is no requirement that the insurance company remind you of the deadline. Insurance companies routinely delay resolving claims for the same reason you find yourself in...some times people fail to file timely claims and the insurance company is then off the hook in paying the injured person's damages. So for example, if your claim was worth $100K, the insurance company just "profited" $100K. Hopefully your injuries are not too serious and that you are able to weather this situation financially and health-wise. If not, then make sure your family and friends know about your situation so that they can avoid making the same mistake. You can also call and complain to your local state legislatures so that if the rules (law) are ever amended, they can have a real life story to tell about the change.
My best wishes to you.
This is a legal disclaimer that my advice here are for general purposes only and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Further, my advice is based upon the limited information and facts that have been provided. Additional facts and/or circumstances may materially change or affect the advice that I would provide. Finally, I have not agreed to represent you and anyone else who may read my response. (Sorry for this legal disclaimer, but it is important for your protection and mine. You do not want to think that I am representing you when I have not agreed to do so. In order for me to act as your attorney, we would need to execute a retainer agreement setting for the terms of the relationship.) Thank you for your understanding.
Was this your own insurance in an uninsured/underinsured motorist claim?? Or was it another party's insurance? Did you have insurance at the time?
How much are your medical bills.
I am licensed in California only and my answers on Avvo assume California law. Answers provided by me are for general information only. They are not legal advice. Answers must not be relied upon. Legal advice must be based on the interplay between specific exact facts and the law. This forum does not allow for the discussion of that interplay. My answer to any specific question would likely be different if that interplay were explored during an attorney-client relationship. I provide legal advice during the course of an attorney-client relationship only. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such a relationship. That relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement signed by each of us. The communications on this website are not privileged or confidential and I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo or because I have answered or commented on a question. All legal proceedings involve deadlines and time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take appropriate action and because I do not provide legal advice in answer to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult with an attorney for legal advice. Also, see Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference
Insurance company employ professional claims handlers for every single claim made... every single one... this is worth repeating... EVERY... SINGLE... ONE... they don't go and think, hmmm... let's let the mortgage broker on the floor below handle this one as it looks really easy and it will save us some money 'cause those professionals want too much money. Likewise, every single claimant with a bodily injury should "employ" a professional wherein professional is defined as "lawyer." Having professionals on each side is designed to avoid rookie mistakes like letting a statute of limitations stop a great case dead in its tracks.
Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D.
Attorney at Law, Physician
Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D. Attorney at Law, Physician Fransen & Molinaro, LLP 4160 Temescal Canyon Road, Suite 306 Corona, CA 92833 (951)520-9684 www.fransenandmolinaro.com / www.888MDJDLAW.com "When you need a lawyer, call the Doctor... Call Paul J. Molinaro, M.D., J.D... Call (888)MDJDLAW." * This post and all others I make on Internet are for informational purposes only. None of the information or materials I post are legal advice. Nothing I post as comments, answers, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. While I try to be accurate, I do not guarantee accuracy. ** Fransen & Molinaro, LLP practices in the areas of defective drug and medical device litigation (Actos, Accutane, Actonel, Antidepressants, Avandia, Bextra, Byetta, DePuy Hip Implant, Digitek, Ephedra, Fosamax, Gadolinium, GranuFlo, Guidant Implantable Defibrillators, Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT), Ketek, Kugel Mesh Patch, Lipitor, Mesothelioma, Nuvaring, Ortho Evra, Paxil, Pradaxa, Prempro, Prisma Dialysis Recall, Reglan, ReNu with MoistureLoc, Smith and Nephew Hip Replacement, Stryker Hip Replacement, Tequin, Topamax, Transvaginal Mesh, Trasylol, Vioxx, Yaz, Zelnorm, Zimmer Durom, Zyprexa, and More), medical malpractice, personal injury, and real estate law and does so anywhere in the State of California. *** If you enjoy my posts, enjoyed a consultation with me, or are a happy satisfied client, please give me an Avvo recommendation/review.
Basic statute is 2 years. There are some exceptions that can 'toll' (extend) that time period, such as a period of incapacity, or the defendant was out of state. you should immediately consult with an attorney time is really against you and every day counts.
Unfortunately, unless you have an exemption from the tolling of the Statute, you have run out of time. The insurance company DID notify you of the Statute which is the only requirement that they must perform. You really should have retained a professional personal injury attorney and you did yourself a disservice in not doing so. It is too bad that this has happened to you. I would suggest as a few of my colleagues have mentioned, that you contact a local area personal injury attorney and discuss the matter in more detail with the attorney and have that attorney provide you with his/her thoughts. Best of luck.
Mr. Crosner is licensed to practice law in California and has been practicing law in California since 1978. The response herein is general legal and business analysis.. It is not intended nor construed to be "legal advice" but rather it is analysis, and different lawyers may analyze this matter differently, especially if there are additional facts not reflected in the question. Oftentimes the question does not include significant and important facts and timelines that, if known, could significantly change the reply and make it unsuitable. I am not your attorney until retained by a written retainer agreement signed by both of us. See also avvo.com terms and conditions item 9, incorporated as if it was reprinted here.
No, you do not have a case. You let the statute of limitations expire and you are now barred from bringing a claim. The carrier advised you in writing about the statute of limitations. Many State insurance commissioners, through the regulatory process, require a carrier to advise an unrepresented claimant in writing about the applicable statute of limitations. It appears the carrier complied with the regulation.
You have learned a very costly and unfortunate lesson here, which hopefully others who read this on Avvo.com can profit from.
Insurance carriers are neither your friend nor your good neighbor. The sole goal of any insurance company, as you have harshly learned, is to pay you nothing or as little as possible on your claim. Here, the carrier has paid nothing and will pay nothing.
If this information has been helpful, please indicate below.
Mr. Lundeen is licensed to practice law in Florida and Vermont. The response herein is not legal advice and does not create an attorney/client relationship. The response is in the form of legal education and is intended to provide general information about the matter within the question. Oftentimes the question does not include significant and important facts and timelines that, if known, could significantly change the reply and make it unsuitable. Mr. Lundeen strongly advises the questioner to confer with an attorney in your state in order to ensure proper advice is received.
This ans. does not create an attorney/client relationship.