We'll help you find the right solution for your needs
Does this sound like your topic?
Basically - the Supremes sent my case back to the court order that prevailed prior to the last court appearance where the new judge "made a decision" that obliterated prior court order.
My thought is the "decision that was reversed and remanded" - is null and void as if he never happened.
Or does it depend on the new district court judge's "opinion" of what "reversed" and "remanded" means?