I am a defendant in case. The plaintiff is in his second amended complaint.
Again I filed a demurrer. The court sustained my demurrer with leave to amend.
The court ruling was: "The Court reluctantly grants leave to amend as it is not yet convinced that Plaintiffs will be unable to sufficiently state a cause of action for negligence. The Court anticipates no further leave to amend will be granted."
It seems to me that the word "unable" should have been "able" and thus the court statement would mean that the court thinks that the plaintiff will not be able show a cause of action.
Was this a typo in the court ruling or is there no typo and the ruling means that the court thinks that the plaintiff can indeed show cause of action?