It seems to me that 3 is not the correct answer. None of the above are correct. Subject to final order may be the closest, since the individual in question, if the returned to the U.S. without permission, should be subject to reinstatement of the prior order.
The above is intended only as general information, and does not constitute legal advice. You must speak with an attorney to discuss your individual case.
4. "subject to Final Order" is the correct category in your situation, since by having illegally reentered after having been "expeditiously" removed you have made yourself subject to the reinstatement of the previous order of removal.
Behar Intl. Counsel 619.234.5962 Kindly be advised that the answer above is only general in nature cannot be construed as legal advice, given that not enough facts are known. It is your responsibility to retain a lawyer to analyze the facts specific to your particular situation in order to give you specific advice. Specific answers will require cognizance of all pertinent facts about your case. Any answers offered on Avvo are of a general nature only, and are not meant to create an attorney-client relationship.
I agree with my colleagues ... 4 : final order
PROFESSOR OF IMMIGRATION LAW for over 10 years -- This blog posting is offered for informational purposes only. It does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Also, keep in mind that this is an INTERNET BLOG. You should not rely on anything you read here to make decisions which impact on your life. Meet with an attorney, via Skype, or in person, to obtain competent personal and professional guidance.