An investment is not a guaranty of repayment or a right to demand repayment at a time of the investors choosing (in the absense of a written partnership apreement.
However, a "statutory" partnership is still governed by rules. To highlight the considerations (and without an in depth inverview) is not possible, but your returning "partner" probably has the right to an accounting for 50% of the distributions since he diappeared (less some defenses you might have) and probably has a statutory right to dissolve the corporation which, might have some major tax ramifications and lease payment raminfications at the least.
Although consunsulting a lawyer now may seem like and expense, it is more likely to save you money in the long-run. You should prepare every bit of paperwork for your meeting with the lawyer including but not limited to busienss taax returns and detailed summary of facts and dates.
Finally, before litigation consider mediation, a non0-binding procedure which seeks to find a "win-win" as opposed to litigation, which is inherently "win-lose".
Good luck on resolving this.
The above is general legal and business analysis. It is not "legal advice" but analysis, and different lawyers may analyse this matter differently, especially if there are additional facts not reflected in the question. I am not your attorney until retained by a written retainer agreement signed by both of us. I am only licensed in California. See also avvo.com terms and conditions item 9, incorporated as if it was reprinted here.Ask a similar question
It is a shame that you do not have anything in writing - it is always wise to spend a little at the front end rather than a large amount at the end. But did you discuss what would happen? The real question here is, is he entitled to his $50K back or the value of half of the business. You need to sit down with a business attorney as this will take careful evaluation and not something that can be answered on a forum like this
Kazerouni Law Group, APC is a law firm concentrating its efforts in the area of consumer law, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”), and California's Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, California Civil Code §§ 1788-1788.32 ("Rosenthal Act"). Our lawyers are specially trained in the Federal FDCPA, Consumer Defense, and other consumer related matters. Our goal is to protect you against unfair, deceptive and abusive debt collection practices. Creditors, professional debt collectors, and attorneys who violate the law are subject to paying damages, statutory penalties, and the consumer's attorneys fees and costs. If you feel you have been abused, deceived or treated unfairly, you may need a lawyer. We can be reached at 800-400-6808, or through one of the evaluation forms on this or at our own website at www.kazlg.com. The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or as forming an attorney-client relationship. No attorney-client relationship between the reader and Abbas Kazerounian has been formed. If you are in the State of California and would be interested in a formal free consultation either visit Kazerouni Law Group, APC website at www.kazlg.com or call me toll free at 800-400-6808.Ask a similar question
You have a situation that is both legally and factually complicated. Attorney Doland provided an excellent overview of the major issues to be addressed.
One thing that I think is reasonably clear is that your partner is not entitled to return of his $50K investment. Unfortunately, what he *is* entitled to will require quite a few accountant and lawyer hours to determine - probably an expense that is not justified given the value of the business. You both will be better off if you can find a quick, inexpensive way to settle this matter.
This information does not constitute legal advice and does not establish an attorney-client relationship.Ask a similar question
One thing to remember is that people often threaten a law suit. They think that they are going to be able to get an attorney to represent them on a contingency agreement. The truth is most lawyers don't work on contingency, especially in a case like this one. Your "partner" is going to have to come up with a significant sum in order to bring a law suit. In our office our litigation attorneys usually require an initial retainer of $25,000. So you have to ask yourself. Is it really likely that he would have the means and the willingness to risk $25,000 to get back something that is in all likelihood significantly less than the $50,000 he invested? I think it would be wise for you to spend a few hundred to talk to an attorney, but i probably would not lose a lot of sleep over this.
Every situation is different, it is important to discuss your legal issue with a knowledgeable attorney in your jurisdiction. To schedule an appointment with me please contact me at 800 220-4205 or www.MartyBurbankLaw.comAsk a similar question