Since the co-borrower is not in BK, that name is unnecessary on the reaffirmation. If you fail to reaffirm the mortgage and keep making the payments, no reaffirmation is needed. It is unlikely the bank will release the co-borrower. Why should they?
You are not my client and I am not your attorney. This advice is given in the spirit of the AVVO platform and is based on general legal principles. You become a client when you enter into a formal retainer agreement with me.
The coborrower does not need to reaffirm (and does not receive a discharge) because they did not file bk. They do not have to be on the RA. Whatever liability they had remains.
Please remember to mark my answer as "helpful" or even the "best" if that is the case. My response is general information not intended as legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship. Seek advice from a qualified attorney to see how the law fits your specific facts. I am licensed to practice law in Washington and Oregon. www. RRLawGroup.com
Reaffirmation will not accomplish your goal, is not required, nor would the court likely approve it. BTW, it is not the mortgage company that reaffirms a debt, it is YOU.
Reaffirmation does not alter the nature of the underlying debt obligation. Your co-borrower will still be obligated on the note. The beneficiary of the deed of trust can still foreclose if you do not make the payments and, most likely, you are protected by anti-deficiency statutes. If you are not protected by anti-deficiency statutes – reaffirmation is DEFINITELY a bad idea.
I suggest you consult a bankruptcy attorney – it appears you have not done so. Good luck
My answers are for general information only. They are not legal advice. Answers assume California law. I am licensed in California, only. Answers must not be relied upon.<br> <br> Legal advice and counsel must be based on the interplay between specific exact facts and the law. This forum does not allow for the discussion of that interplay. My answer to any specific question would likely be different if that interplay were explored during an attorney-client relationship. <br> <br> I provide legal advice and counsel during the course of an attorney-client relationship only. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such a relationship. That relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement signed by each of us.<br> <br> The communications on this website are not privileged or confidential. I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo because I have answered or commented on a question. Specifically, I assume no duty to respond to any question, comment, telephone call, or email.<br> <br> All legal proceedings involve deadlines and time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take appropriate action and because I do not provide legal advice or counsel in answer to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult an attorney licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction for advice and counsel. See, also, Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference.<br>
Your bankruptcy released only you from any debts. The co-borrower did not file and, therefore, remains liable on the debt and does not need to sign anything. Therefore, there is no reason the lender will not send you a reaffirmation for just you.
This is not legal advice and I am not your attorney until you retain my office. Always consult with an attorney in your area before acting on anything you read on the internet.