It actually is quite complicated. Under some circumstances the court may accept the innocent mistake/convenience argument, but other judges may not.
Under the rules governing the conduct of attorneys in New York it may be necessary to remind you that this answer could be considered attorney advertising.
My guess, and that's all it is because one never knows what a judge is going to do, is that with tracing(showing the monies in and out), the judge should see the error plainly enough. I hope, with this money riding on it, you'll be using an attorney.
Attorneys on Avvo donate their time and your feedback is appreciated. Be sure to mark the "Best Answer" or Helpful" to your questions.
With respect to assets, it is the responsibility of the person claiming that an item or funds are non-marital to prove the source of the asset, i.e. to trace the asset to a source that makes it non-marital according to the language in the statute. With respect to debts, there is not a presumption that any debt incurred during the marriage is marital, so if one spouse enjoyed all of the benefit of the borrowed funds, that debt could be characterized by a court as non-marital and the sole liability of that spouse.
Sign up to receive a 10-part series of useful information and legal advice about the divorce process.