It depends on the claims, who is asserting them, and where they might be filed. You didn't provide any details so we can't tell you much more. See a lawyer who has experience in Chapter 11.
Yes, with certain exceptions, the automatic stay provisions (section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code) protect the company from creditor action.
You asked about legal action from "non-creditors". I don't know what you mean by "non-creditor", so I don't have enough information to answer the question more precisely.
This answer is for discussion purposes only and will not be considered legal advice. Further, a court could potentially decide the question contrary to my answer.
First of all, I am very worried that you are asking a question like that because step #1 is to consult with an attorney that you trust regarding this matter.
Chapter 11 is extremely complicated and seasoned attorneys make a lot of mistakes because they think it's an easy transition from 7s and 13s to 11s.
So I recommend you find a good Chapter 11 attorney to help you in this process.
The automatic stay only protects you from pre-bankruptcy claims or actions against you. Post filing actions are not affected by it.
The above is general legal and business analysis. It is not "legal advise" but analysis, and different lawyers may analyse this matter differently, especially if there are additional facts not reflected in the question. I am not your attorney until retained by a written retainer agreement signed by both of us. I am only licensed in California. See also avvo.com terms and conditions item 9, incorporated as if it was reprinted here. Please visit my web site: www.avanesianlaw.com for more information about my services.
Most probably. A lawyer doesn't like to say "certainly". Section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a bankruptcy debtor the famous basic protection the debtor seeks, the "automatic stay" or freeze on legal action. The stay is "applicable to all entities". Entity and person are words that the Code defines very broadly. The Code lists a wide variety of legal actions that are subject to the stay. So -- because the moving party and the type of action are both broad categories-- the answer to your question is most probably. Consult an experienced Ch 11 lawyer near you.
The above is meant to be valuable and not harmful. A lawyer intending to help a client or prospective client NEEDS facts. The more facts, the better. This medium, and often the question, do not promote fact gathering as well as an attorney's questions. So this answer is subject to revision based upon more facts. This response does not create an attorney client relationship and is not an attorney client communication. You should obtain advice from independent counsel of your own selection before proceeding. Visit JSCBKLAW.com for more info...
As the others point out, there isn't enough information to answer your question. When you say a "non-creditor" do you mean not a creditor PRIOR to the bankruptcy case being filed? If so, most likely you are free to commence a legal action against the Chapter 11 debtor (and debtor-in-possession) outside of bankruptcy court.
Mark Markus has been practicing exclusively bankruptcy law in California since 1991. He is a Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law by the State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization, AV-Rated by martindale.com, and A+ rated by the Better Business Bureau. His webpage is www.bklaw.com
Legal disclaimer: Mark J. Markus practices law in California only. The information is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Answering this question does not in any way constitute legal representation.
The first question is why a non-creditor would even be filing an action--the basis for any action is some kind of relief, which generally means the person filing is claiming to be a creditor.
If the action is for something *before* the Chapter 11 was filed, then it needs to either be brought as a proof of claim, an adversary proceeding, or a motion for relief from stay.
If for something *after* the petition was filed, it may be possible to bring it, but no judgment could be executed until after