If you were in a public place without any expectation of privacy, then he can take your picture. If he uses your picture in an advertisement or something like that without your permission, then you could probably sue. But there is generally nothing wrong with someone taking your picture when you are in a place that can be considered public. A liquor store is most likely considered public.Ask a similar question
Mr. Spirtos is correct. You would have not invasion of privacy claim if the picture was taken of you when you were in a location where you had not expectation of privacy. If he were to post the picture somewhere with untrue statements associated with it, you might have a claim. If used the picture for a commercial purpose, like selling your picture, or using your likeness to create good will or public support for him, then there may well be violation of your privacy rights related to your right to your name and likeness.
Good luck to you.
This answer should not be construed to create any attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship can be formed only through the mutual execution of an attorney-client agreement. The answer given is based on the extremely limited facts provided and the proper course of action might change significantly with the introduction of other facts. All who read this answer should not rely on the answer to govern their conduct. Please seek the advice of competent counsel after disclosing all facts to that attorney. This answer is intended for California residents only. The answering party is only licensed to practice in the State of California.Ask a similar question
You were in a public place. You had no real expectation of privacy. You can sue, but for naught. If he were to use the photo in an improper fashion, perhaps.Ask a similar question