The opposing counsel suggested the use of a third party company for communication purposes. This company is called Family Wizard and it isn't a free service. The reason the attorney suggested this was to prevent slandering comments coming from my ex-wife. The judge agreed with it, and most likely it would be included within his report. My Attorney mention to the judge that I wouldn't like to pay for such service and that if they want me to use, they would have to pay for it. However, nothing was really said about it.
1) Can a court forced someone to use a private company for communication purposes?
2) All of these information can be monitored by both Attorneys and even the court. Where does the right of privacy falls into?
I can't imagine that it is legal for the court to force someone