Your description of events is a little hard to understand. As a matter of pleading, you typically can amend to add new causes of action that relate to the facts originally pleaded in the original complaint; that is, new causes of action based upon the same facts will "relate back" to the filing of the original complaint and deemed within the statute of limitations. Therefore, it will really depend on what you alleged in your original complaint. This analysis can be complicated though, so you will likely need to consult an attorney to address this issue.
Legal disclaimer: PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU COMMENT, EMAIL ME OR PHONE ME. I'm only licensed in CA. This answer doesn't make me your lawyer, and neither do follow-up comments and/or emails and/or phone calls, and you shouldn't expect me to respond to your further questions if you haven't hired me. We need an actual agreement confirmed in writing before any attorney-client relationship is formed. This answer doesn't constitute legal advice, and shouldn't be relied on, since each state has different laws, each situation is fact specific, and it is impossible to evaluate a legal problem without a comprehensive consultation and review of all the facts and documents at issue.
I agree with my colleague. I am a little confused about the post. Feel free to re-post with more details. In general, amending a complaint can be accomplished. Did you consider hiring an attorney for help?
This communication does not create an attorney-client relationship. This means that I am not your lawyer and I will not appear in court simply by posting on this site. If you would like me to represent you, you must call my office, sign a written fee agreement and pay a legal fee, assuming I do not have a conflict of interest and you are in Southern California. If I respond to your question and you have follow up questions by posting on this site, I may or may not reply. This information should not be construed as legal advice. I am offering my opinion. Each person's case is unique, and that's why you should contact a lawyer over the phone for a consultation for your situation. That's why you should not rely on any response that an attorney posts on this site. I am licensed in California. I am not licensed in another state or country. I do not practice law outside of California.
I have read your post a couple of times and it is hard for me to pull out a coherent question. You mention an attonrey. Talk to that professional about your situation.
In no way am I offering you legal advice, and in no way has my comment created an attorney-client relationship. You are not to rely upon my note above in any way, but insted need to sit down with counsel and share all relevant facts before receiving fully-informed legal advice. If you want to be completely sure of your rights, you must sit down with an experienced criminal defense attorney to be fully aware of your rights.
Generally, the courts are liberal in allowing amendments within certain defined criteria. Your facts seem extraordinarily complicated and I would strongly urge you to seek out legal counsel. If you call the County Bar Association you can arrange a telephone call or a meeting with an attorney experienced in this area of the law for a very small cost, normally $30. If your finances are not in good condition there maybe a limit4d means panel where attorneys may be available without charge. Otherwise go on the internet and find some experienced attorneys in your area who represent clients with bad faith claims. Many of them will allow you to have a first visit without cost. It’s very confusing that you have two case numbers, so mention that to the attorney you speak with.
This participating Attorney does not warrant any information provided, nor are we creating an Attorney-Client relationship by providing said information to you on this site. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute, offer, induce, promise, or contract of any kind. The content provided is presented as a courtesy to be used only for informational purposes and is not represented to be error free. The Law Offices of John N. Kitta makes no representations or warranties of any kind with respect to its answer to inquiries, and such representations and warranties are being expressly disclaimed. Given limited facts, we are attempting to share relevant information concerning this area of the law as a public service.
I agree with my colleagues. The relation back rule allows the new cause of action to be within the SOL, assuming the original summons and complaint was filed within the SOL and the facts are the same or similar. Most courts are liberal with allowing the amended complaint to relate back for SOL purposes. You need an attorney ASAP.
All content posted on marcusmoraleslaw.com and avvo.com is for educational purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. Any information conveyed to marcusmoraleslaw.com, avvo.com or by telephone to the Law Offices of Marcus W. Morales does not create an attorney-client relationship until an attorney-client fee agreement has been entered into and signed by both parties.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.