Skip to main content

Can court tell the parent without educational decision-making authority not to interfere with child's school search?

Brooklyn, NY |

My sister and her ex are in negotiations to move from joint custody to a situation where she retains medical & educational decision-making and he gets religious decision-making. She lives in NYC and he lives 45 minutes away in New Jersey. His proposal gives her educational decision-making, but requires her to explore schools in New Jersey.

The child is in third grade, and no schooling decisions need to be made until middle school.

Her ex belittles NYC to their child and is campaigning to get the child to desire to live with him instead.

Can he be barred from advocating that the child move to New Jersey in all ways? Is undue stress on the child, who may feel like choosing one place is choosing one parent.

Can he be *required* to positively support the child living in NYC?

+ Read More

Attorney answers 5


Possibly, if the suggestion that schools are generically better in NJ is a covert ploy to gain physical custody. If the efforts persist, your sister might be able to make a case that this is an indirect way of disparaging a parent and undermining her authority under the joint custody agreement to have both physical custody and decisionmaking over schooling. She should speak to a family court attorney about the advisability of filing an enforcement petition in NY Family Court to stop this behavior.

This answer is provided under the “Terms and Conditions of Use” (“ToU”), particularly ¶9 which states that any information provided is not intended as legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship between you and me or any other attorney. Such information is intended for general informational purposes only and should be used only as a starting point for addressing your legal issues. In particular, my answers and those of others are not a substitute for an in-person or telephone consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction about your specific legal issue, and you should not rely solely upon Legal Information you obtain from this website or other resources which may be linked to an answer for informational purposes. You understand that questions and answers or other postings to the Site are not confidential and are not subject to attorney-client privilege. The full Avvo ToU are set forth at . In addition, while similar legal principles often apply in many states, I am only licensed to practice in the State of New York and Federal Courts. Any general information I provide about non-New York laws should be checked with an attorney licensed to practice in your State. Lastly, New York State Court rules (22 NYCRR Part 1200, Rule 7.1) also require me to inform you that my answers and attorney profile posted on the site may be considered "attorney advertising" and that "prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome".


If your sister is engaged in negotiations of this magnitude, I hope she has a lawyer she is discussing this problem with. To answer part of your question, a court can direct one parent to stay out of the school selection process. But that isn't really the problem. The problem is that dad is belittling everything about the child's life with mom in order to get the child to want to live with, or at least spend more time with, dad. You are correct that this puts the child in the middle of the parent's fight and places excessive stress upon the child. It is a terrible thing for a parent to do.

While a court can order parents not to discuss these issues with the child, such orders are nearly impossible to enforce. However, if his actions are proven to the court, he may find the result is the opposite of what he desires.

This anawer is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship and may be considered attorney advertising. This answer should not supplant advice received from any attorney the questioner may have or obtain, as that attorney will be able to provide more thorough and informed advice.


If your sister will be the one make educational decisions, then there is no reason to force her to explore schools in NJ. Forcing her to do that, means that she has conditional educational decision making. Neither parent should be campaigning the child on any issue. Both parents should support the child spending time with the other parent and should not behave in a manner designed to alienate the child from the other. Yes, he is required as a part to be positive and support the child living in NYC much like the mother should support the child spending time in NJ with his dad.


I would not agree to that option. The father's move makes it less likely that he would get custody of the child. There are so many factors that affect custody issues that it would be unfair of me to give you any definitive answer.

Answers to questions on Avvo are mean to inform not to advise. Do not follow any advise given until you speak to a lawyer. The answers are geared towards the general not the specifics of your case.


There are many factors in determining custody and visitation. One of which is whether either parent is placing undue stress on the child as it appears the father is doing here. If the mother has the right to make the decision about school, but has to consider schools in NJ, then she should do so but ultimately it is her decision as to which school is chosen. If the father continues to pressure the child, it should be brought to the court's attention and an appropriate court order can be put in place.

Under no circumstances should any response or information given here be construed as creating an attorney client relationship.

Avvo child custody email series

Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about child custody law.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer