Co-Defendants may testify against each other or even in favor of each other. It is not uncommon for co-defendants to testify against each other. However, there must be something more than the co-defendant's testimony to convict. And even though the court may have sustained a motion for speedy trial, is still no guarantee he will receive a speedy trial.
Answers provided on Avvo does not form an attorney-client relationship or indicate that the attorney represents or even will represent the client. Responses to questions are provided and based upon the facts as stated in the question. While attorneys attempt to make a complete and accurate response, there is no guaranty or warranty that the response is correct. You are encouraged to seek qualified counsel, licensed in the state(s) which have jurisdiction over the matters for advice. You are also encouraged to be careful as to your postings as the postings are not confidential.
Well it doesn't sound like he got his speedy trial. His attorney should file a motion to dismiss based on a violation of his right to a speedy trial. Of course if his attorney has been the cause of any resets in the case, he may not be able to make this argument. And yes, co-defendants testify against each other all the time.
Macy Jaggers's answer to a legal question on Avvo does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Ms. Jaggers offers everyone a free consultation to discuss their case. Feel free to call her office at 214-365-9800 to make an appointment (phones are answered 24 hours) or visit her website at www.macyjaggers.com for more information about her services and recent victories.
In Texas, the rule is that co-defendants can testify against the defendant. The more technical term for this is that an "accomplice" can testify against a defendant.
However, unless the testimony of the accomplice is "corroborated", it cannot be considered as evidence in the case for any purpose.
"Corroborated" does not mean that each and every thing the accomplice says is supported by some other piece of evidence in the case. And, it does not even mean that ANYTHING the accomplice says is supported by another piece of evidence in the case.
What "corroborated" means is that there is some other evidence that tends to tie the defendant to the case in a way that tends to make the defendant appear guilty.
This other evidence, however, does not have to be proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Rather, proof beyond a reasonable doubt can be built out of what the accomplice says plus the other evidence.
Yes, it is complicated. But, if read step by step, not that confusing.
As far as the delay in getting to trial, 8 to 10 months is, unfortunately, not that long a delay in a criminal case.
Answers on Avvo are for general information purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice. No attorney / client relationship is created by providing this answer. For specific advice about your situation, you should consult a competent attorney of your choosing.