Yes - that is standard practice to require a lessee to carry general liability insurance to add the landlord as an additional insured.
In most states, a landowner is liable for accidents that occur on the property even when the landowner has leased it to another. It is therefore prudent for the landlord to require that the tenant obtain insurance and name the landlord as an additional insured.
If this answer was helpful, please mark it as helpful or as a best answer. This answer is for general education purposes only. It neither creates an attorney-client relationship nor provides legal guidance or advice. The answer is based on the limited information provided and the answer might be different had additional information been provided. You should consult an attorney.Ask a similar question
I agree, this is common in most leases today because of the liability issue.
DISCLAIMER: David J. McCormick is licensed to practice law in the State of Wisconsin and this answer is being provided for informational purposes only because the laws of your jurisdiction may differ. This answer based on general legal principles and is not intended for the purpose of providing specific legal advice or opinions. Under no circumstances does this answer constitute the establishment of an attorney-client relationship.Ask a similar question
I'll address the second part of your question, can I ask the landowner to include my property as "additional insured" on his policy?
I see where you're coming from -- the landlord is imposing a new cost on you and you'd like something in return -- but if you buy homeowner's insurance for the sake of the liability protection, I think it will include casualty insurance for your own stuff. You wouldn't get any duplicate benefit by having the landlord insure your stuff.
Disclaimer: exchange of information on this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.Ask a similar question