I over heard someone asked this question. They were in fear of losing their home. This person wasent the driver. The person that they co-signed for was the driver in the car accident. The co-signer is suspicious about if the person that they co-signed for really had car insurance or not. And is afraid of what kind of legal trouble it could cause..By the way. The car that hit them was a hit and run. But there was a passenger in the car of the co-signer. Can the passenger sue the co-signer if the the driver had the car accident but no car insurance?.
As I am licensed in Florida and Vermont, I cannot comment specifically on Illinois state law. However, generally, a mere cosigner on the loan, but not a titled owner on the vehicle, is usually not liable for injuries caused by another driver. However, under certain factual circumstances, that may not be true. If the cosigner provided money or secured the vehicle for the driver by cosigning and this cosigner knew that the person who would be driving the vehicle presented an unreasonable risk to the public (for example, was a known drunk, addicted to drugs, had a horrible driving record, was an epileptic prone to uncontrollable seizures etc.) then there may be liability on the cosigner for enabling or negligently entrusting this vehicle to the driver. We had a case such as this in the state of Vermont a number of years ago, where a grandmother facilitated the purchase of a vehicle for her grandson, who she knew to be an unqualified driver. The grandmother was found responsible and ordered to pay the damages caused by her grandson.
The co-signed would not be liable for damages under the facts you stated. Your queston indicates that the driver of the vehicle, although possibly uninsured, was not at fault in the accident. If the driver was not liable for the accident, there is no way the co-signer could be liable for the accident. The only way the co-signer would be liable for damages is if he negligently entrusted a vehicle in which he owned to someone he knew of should of know would use the vehicle recklessly. Proving negligent entrustment in IL is difficult unless the driver of the vehicle had prior moving violations, had displayed reckless driving in the past, or was under the influence and the co-signer knew or should have known. Failure to carry insurance, while against the law, doesn't not make one liable for an accident. If the hit and run driver was totally at fault, the passenger can't claim that the driver was negligent. That said, the co-signer may be in trouble with the lender if the vehicle was uninsured and the loan was secured by the vehicle. Most loan agreements obligate the borrowers to keep the vehicle (the collateral) insured. If the borrowers fail to do so, the lender may repossess the vehicle, may place collateral insurance on the vehicle and charge the borrowers, or, if the uninsured vehicle is destroyed, the lender can demand full payment of the balance of the loan. If the driver doesn't pay, the lender will come after the co-signer.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.
Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.
Years licensed, work experience, education
Peer endorsements, associations, awards
Publications, speaking engagements