I found this statement in the “FEE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT” of the WCAB:
“Any person who makes or causes to be made any knowingly false or fraudulent
material statement or material representation for the purpose of obtaining or
denying worker' compensation benefits or payments is guilty of a felony.”
My WCJ said I only objected to the Apportionment Before the DEU Rating; in the; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION JUDGE; my WCJ states: “Applicant is correct that she presented written argument contesting apportionment in this matter prior to the matter going to the Disability Evaluation Unit for rating. However, once the formal rating was issued Applicant did not object to that formal rating.” But in fact I filed 2 Objections after the DEU Rating; but the WCJ did not send them in to the WCAB for my Recon. To prove I filed the Objections; I copied the Presiding Judge.My WCJ also misleads the WCAB in her F&A. In the WCJ’s F&A she states that I never objected: “There having been neither objection to the recommended rating nor a timely request for cross-examination of the Disability Evaluation Specialist, in accordance with the rater’s recommendation, it is found that Applicant is entitled to a permanent disability award, after apportionment, of 75%”. These documents would have barred the WCJ from apportioning my 100% Claim. I plan to file a complaint with the Ethics Committee; what codes have been violated?