You should hire an experienced lawyer to work out either a deed in lieu or other option that can cancel the trial and the deficiency
A trial judgment will leave a deficiency against you
There area many other options
I agree with my colleague. You should consult with an attorney regarding your case. If you want to avoid a deficiency judgment, your best bet is to try to continue the trial and try to work out a deed in lieu with a waiver of deficiency or some other deal in which the bank agrees to waive the deficiency. Many attorneys on here, including myself, offer free initial consultations.
The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. The information contained in this Website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. No recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in the recipient's state.
I agree with both attorneys above - hiring an experienced attorney to negotiate a waiver of deficiency is your best bet. If you do not desire to retain an attorney, attending the trial will never hurt. You should find out what attorney is handling your case on behalf of the Plaintiff and speak to them about waiving deficiency in exchange for consent to judgment. There are no guarantees but it's better to attend and ask about options rather than not attend. There are better routes than consenting to judgment and an attorney could help you make that decision. Feel free to contact my office if you're seeking help in this regard. Alternatively, there are plenty of other Orlando based foreclosure attorneys who may be able to help.
The advice above is not intended to be legal advice
I agree with the other attorneys that hiring experienced counsel would be the best idea. You are right to be concerned about being burdened with a deficiency judgment after this is finished. The bank will likely not be concerned about the assets you have (or don't have) since your circumstances could change over time. They may instead base their negotiation decisions on the certainty of their success at trial. Be warned also that, often, there is not a lot of opportunity to speak with counsel at the scheduled court date. If you were hoping to do that, be sure to make arrangements to be there early. Further, if you hired counsel, they could actually attempt to negotiate before your court date an agreement when there is more time to discuss the matter with the bank's counsel.
Jennefer A. Pucylowski, Esq. of Daley Law
Practicing Foreclosure Defense in Orange, Seminole, and Brevard County
The quick answer to your question is that it can't hurt your cause to attend the trial. But it also won't make much of a difference. The deficiency judgment is simply a factor of what you owe less what the bank sells the condo for. It makes no difference that you have no assets or may be otherwise "judgment proof". The above attorneys are correct. Your best bet is to hire an experienced foreclosure attorney who can negotiate the best possible exit for you. If you incurred other debts during your period of unemployment bankruptcy may also be an option to consider. Congratulations on going back to school and best of luck.
The above is opinion based on very limited facts and not legal advice. This is not a substitute for a consultation with an attorney and does not constitute the establishment of an attorney/client relationship.