need more details and a clearer more cohesive question.
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return
e-mail and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
IRS Circular 230 Notice: Unless specifically stated otherwise, any tax
advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting,
marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter
Unless specifically stated otherwise, this communication shall not be deemed
to be legal or tax advice, and no attorney-client relationship shall be
deemed to have been created.
Your belief would support a notion that the tenant allowing other persons (felons recently released, or otherwise) in the apartment is in violation of the occupancy agreement and is subject to either administrative proceedings for a lease violation and termination and or to a direct lawsuit for eviction in Housing Court.
The penalties are extreme for a tenant caught in the wrong.
If your interest is a safe building and you know of a condition that may be dangerous due to a tenant's behavior, do you feel comfortable passing this information on by yourself, or believe you need an attorney to do so?
The answer provided to you is in the nature of general information. The general proposition being that you should try to avoid a bad outcome if you can.