family and patient disagree even though patient does have a long time blood condition, yet they still go ahead and administer medications that have major contradictions, labels advise against giving to anyone over 65, harm will far out do any benefit, and side effects kill the patient, what recourse does family have? Is it civil or criminal? Standard of care was way out of balance, prudent doctors would not have gone so far, to such drastic measures to cure an infection, equivalent to using a cannon to kill a fly! To the grieving family, this was nothing more than a hospital, it's doctors, risk mgmt and ethics panel taking advantage of the assisted suicide law to cover up their own deliberate wrongful death and malpractice.
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.