This sounds pretty outrageous, but whether or not you have a viable claim will depend in part on whether or not the failure to diagnose and treat you in a more timely manner resulted in increased, long lasting physical problems.
In seeking an attorney on this site, beware of limiting your search to attorneys with a 10 rating, and carefully read the AVVO disclaimer regarding their rating system. There are certain factors that are given great weight which do not necessarily have any bearing on an attorney's experience, abilities, and results with certain types of cases. Accordingly, the rating numbers can be misleading. Also beware of basing your choice on the fee charged, as a low fee, depending on the skill, experience and determination of the specific attorney handling your case, could actually have an inverse relationship to the amount actually put in your pocket.
Your experience sounds quite disturbing. If you are thinking of a malpractice case you should consider this. In order to pursue a malpractice case you will need a doctor that will review all of the medical records and be willing to opine that the ER doctor/hospital deviated from the standard of care and that deviation caused you an injury. This is very costly so you must have a significant injury in order to make it economically feasible to proceed. It sounds like you don't meet that threshold however you might want to review the case with a malpractice attorney in order to discuss your options.
First, if I understand you correctly -you did not incur damage beyond fear. Thus, there is not much a civil attorney can do for you, as we can only obtain a money judgment or settlement for you based on actual provable damages that include medical bills (that you would not have incurred except for negligence), lost wages, etc. I can tell you I am not seeing a case that will result in the hospital paying you any money.
It sounds like your main issue is that you were not treated properly. In that case, your best bet is to file a complaint with the state (which you have) or with the Joint Commission: http://www.jointcommission.org/report_a_complaint.aspx
If your medical records reflect treatments that were never given, this could be a matter of fraud that the Joint Commission would look into. You will have to give them something to show that there is actually fraud. You stated that your records indicate that an EKG was performed, but you say one was not performed. This should be easy to prove. There should be separate EKG results reported which would only be created in the event an EKG was done. If you can show that they billed you for an EKG and reported an EKG in your records, but there are no EKG results you may be able to get somewhere with your complaint.
This information is for educational purposes only, as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. The information provided does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. This information should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed, professional attorney in your state.
Your next step really depends on your damages. Unfortunately, and while this may not seem fair, if "fear" is your only permanent damage, a medical malpractice attorney would have a difficult time proving your case. If, however, you have actual physical injuries as a result of the treatment you received in the ER, this is a different story entirely. Contact a medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible to determine whether or not you have an actionable case.
Negligence and personal injury Medical malpractice Medical expenses for personal injury Lost wages for personal injury Personal injury Personal injury lawsuits Personal injury settlement Medical records and personal injury Types of personal injuries Fraud Lawsuits and disputes Age discrimination Discrimination
Sign up to receive a 3-part series of useful information and advice about personal injury law.