Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

158 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (158) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 51 reviews | Professionalism

Posted by anonymous | March 05, 2024 | Hired Attorney

Somewhat helpful but poor communicator

While he took his time at our initial meeting, every time I tried to talk with him after that he was trying to get me off the phone as soon as possible. It was frustrating because I had to be persistent in reaching out and asking questions to know what the next steps were and what his strategy was. I...n addition, he seemed unprepared at one of my hearings and was unknowledgeable about some of the details of the DMV processes. He helped me get a slightly better deal but was not able to do anything to significantly change my outcome.

Posted by William | February 12, 2020 | Hired Attorney

Multiple dui’s

What can i say about my case, to start off i was facing 2 duis back to back and i had talked to a lot of attorneys and none of them talked to me with confidence like fremont did. We met at a rubios and we went over my charges and what happened as a i remembered . I had to leave for work out of town ...for a fee months so he was able to start working on the case . We jas always in contact with me always sending me texts and updates about the case as well as phone calls and what was going on. First case came by and he got all my charges dismissed this would of been my 3rd dui, and he got all of the charges dropped. I did have to do SCRAM but thats cause the judge had ordered it but turned out it wasn't even necessary . Then i was waiting for the second case and i kept up with payments and he kept up with handling the legal stuff. I knew the other case wasnt going to end up in a dismissal of charges since i made super difficult but he did get my charges lowered and i think he did an excellent job at everything i was never stressing or anything i knew he had it under control . Overall my experience was great he did above and beyond my expectations and did everything in his power to male my life better other wise i would be in prison for about 18 months or so. So over it was great he does deserve this 5 star rating and more !

Posted by anonymous | November 27, 2018 | Hired Attorney

Knows His Stuff

Michael Freemont is an experienced and very competent attorney. He skillfully presented my case using the facts to reduce my DUI charge to a reckless driving. He is an expert in the area of DUI and will aggressively fight for your rights. I am thankful to have had Mr Freemont on my side. I'm not on...e to do reviews, but I felt the need to express my appreciation.

Posted by Ulices | January 29, 2018 | Hired Attorney

Highly Disappointed

Michael was the second lawyer I consulted with about a Second-Offence DUI. I knew that because of the details of my case that I would be charged with a "DUI with a Prior". I did not ask him to "get me clear" or anything outrageous, but did request that he help me "reduce" as much as possible and no j...ail. He assured me that my case would not see "Jail Time" so I hired him. I was moving to Long Beach at the time for work and was very busy opening a new restaurant. Mike requested a "Motion to Dismiss Evidence" because my blood was drawn, with a warrant, and the details of the blood-draw were vague. The motion was struck down because, according to the judge, Mike attempted to "sandbag" his argument with the blood draw, when he originally filed the Motion because of Probable Cause. First Red Flag. The day for sentencing came and I was ordered to pay a $2700 fine, 3 days of community service, completion of a Multiple Conviction Program, MADD panel, and, wait for it, 96 HOURS OF CUSTODY to be completed in 2 weekends. Of course I contacted Michael with my disappointment that his prior assurances were hollow. His solution was simply to appeal the case, but when I called his office as he instructed me to, he had my file in his "CASE CLOSED" pile. Second Red Flag. He struggled with having my sentence Stayed and even had to return to court to make them include the 96 hours of custody, which they wanted me to serve regardless of an appeal. At this time I am working over 50 hours a week and the only thing on my mind is serving out this sentence without assurance from my "trusted lawyer" that things would be alleviated. One full year passed for the appeal process and, of course, we lost. Mike made the same failed argument to the appeal judges that he did when he filed for the Motion to Dismiss Evidence. I had all of my sentence reinstated. Mike offered an alternative to serving 96 hours in county jail, though. He had me apply for CPAC so that I could serve 96 hours at home. After applying, CPAC contacted me about my docket not having CPAC approval. I contacted Mike, and after a few days (I had to reach out to him of course) told me that he "didn't know" that I WASN'T ELIGIBLE. The Final Failure. I am now two weeks away from spending my first weekend in county jail, ever. Throughout this arduous process, I want to make it known that Mike rarely ever got in contact with me of his own will, that I had to reach out to him 99% of the time, and even when I got him on the phone would have to remind him who I was. He clearly exercised neglect in my case, due to the fact that he gave me false information with CPAC. He did however take $3000 from me to show face in court, which I am sure isn't the only reason he had to appear. I will never drink and drive again, but to those who make the mistake and need representation that will fight for you, care about you, and make an effort to keep you "in the know", try talking to Mr. DUI first. $100 less with heaps more charisma and competence. Sorry Mike, but you dropped the ball hard. 2 stars only because I didn't have to appear in court while I am in LA.

Michael Fremont

Replied last January 29, 2018

This case was not a typical case. As a second DUI he was subject to 96 hours custody and it was made clear to client. The blood test done only after client refused and a warrant was necessary to have the blood drawn. This complicated the case. I ran a motion to suppress the blood based upon a lack of approved medical procedure. THE APPEAL WAS DONE FOR FREE . Client knew it would take about a year to resolve. Most attorneys would not offer this. Client was not eligible for electronic monitoring instead of custody (CPAC). MY staff and I always strive to keep my clients informed of the case and procedure. Please read all reviews as 98% are positive.

Posted by anonymous | December 25, 2017 | Hired Attorney

Highly reccomended

I was facing serious charges 13 years ago (DUI with Hit and Run). Mr Fremont literally had my life in his hands. He was able to get all charges reduced to misdemeanors. Many years later after a recent background check there seems to be clerical errors. Mr Fremont immediately returned my emails, revie...wed by records and gave me some comfort that my charges should be recorded as misdemeanors. If needed I will not hesitate to retain further services. This all on Christmas Eve day!

See All Client Reviews