Pamela Kae Rodriguez

She is very good, she really fight our case and we win. she know what she is doing. Thanks Pamela .

Pamela didi a great job arguing my case with an expert understanding of the law. I won every case she argued. Over and over she pointed out the mistakes the other lawyer was making. She knows her law! Pamela is very tough in court but she always was truthful and argued my case with integrity.

We have had many years in and out of court dealing with a high conflict child custody case. Our last attorney was awful. Cost us a ton of money to get nowhere. We asked around for recommendations and Pamela was mentioned to us by a paralegal friend. We were told she is aggressive and tough, just what we needed because the system is historically tough for fathers here. Pamela has done more than we thought possible. The years of fighting in court have been resolved because of her help. We have shared custody of my stepson now and she helped save us from so many false allegations. Excellent attorney, I recommend her to everyone. We are so beyond thankful for her help.

The last time I dealt with her she got me custody. She works the bureaucratic system very well. The system for Fathers is very tough. Give her a chance we have our boy

I had a great distain for her so I told my self I would wait some time after ( about 2 years ) before I wrote this. To start I didn't think I would need much help in my case because I just want to have more access to my kids and be done with it. So I thought Pam should be adequate for the job. She seems to be an aggressive. My case due to my situation was only going to go one way. Being a White male in a Corporate Job making good money working hard for my family the court system is set up to reward the opposite. I provide Pam well prepared documentation which. She communicated fairly well via text. She had to take a couple personal time off which was not communicated to me. I asked her to communicate to the other lawyer and she was very reluctant to do so. I was very disappointed with her progress and almost hired another lawyer (actually gave him a retainer of $3000) after finding out he had a past criminal record I recalled my retainer. because of quite a few of her comments to me I felt that she didn't like me because I was a man. I confronted her after all this and asked her if she was working for me. She said yes. I felt by her statements and actions that she didn't know was an Investment instrument specifically pension plans and 401k plans. I had a unique issue with a small pension plan that need attention for the other lawyer three months prior to a deadline of a signature. She finally presented the request to the other lawyer after we had a deal on the divorce. The other attorney tried to stall on the signature holding up the divorce. Pam to me seemed more concerned about getting the other attorney's request answered than my divorce. I pointed this out to her which made her mad and she threatened to drop me during the divorce. I had to pay for a consultation with high price attorney to sort out my option due to Pam's actions. All that said I could see that she does help out the Hispanic community with the legal system and has done good work with this community. The legal system is not for the people (from my view point the judges distain who they are supposed to serve) she helps them with the system. I think should would better represent women than men.