We'll help you find the right solution for your needs
Does this sound like your topic?
I was photographed and videotaped without my knowledge the guy I was seeing at the time had spiked my drink with something and took photos and videos without my consent as i was passed out rom the laced drink he gave me. He then paste these vide...
I am sorry this has happened to you. You leave out some details. I will assume that he took advantage of you sexually while you were passed out and took intimate sexually suggestive and nude photos of you. You do not say, but I will assume this took place in Washington. The other attorneys gave you general answers, I will give an answer that is specific to Washington.
You really have three issues here.
First, as had been pointed out by other answers, the sexual assault/drugging is a serious crime. You should report this to the police.
Second, posting intimate images of you online is a crime. This crime was covered by existing statutes, but has been made explicitly illegal as of late last year. See RCW 9A.86.010. Police have often not wanted to enforce these laws, but maybe they will when these crimes are connected to a sexual assault with drugging. There is also now a private right of action for you to sue him for posting intimate images of you. See RCW 4.24.795.
Third, you probably want the images removed from the Internet. Once something is on the Internet, it is impossible to remove it completely. But it is usually possible to reduce the exposure by going after search engines and some of the major distributors. This is a complicated process. You should talk to an attorney who is familiar with this process.
Good luck.See question
I'm asking because I've seen a few of people doing it and wondered if it is even legal or considered trespassing.
I do not understand why lawyers from other states answer Washington questions. They do not know Washington law and sometimes get it wrong.
It is true that is some states garbage is no longer private once it is placed in an alley or on a curb. But in other states, including Washington, the expectation of privacy continues even after the garbage can is placed in a public way. See State of Washington v. Boland, 115 Wn.2d 571, 88 P.2d 1112 (1990).
But I agree with the other answer that it is really up to the owner of the garbage can or other garbage storage to take action. Most of the time there is no incentive to act.See question
Is it illegal to film a conversation in a public space without the other person's consent and awareness?
The law is not clear on this issue. It depends on what is being recorded and under what circumstances. There is no substitution to talking with an attorney about your specific case.
In Washington it is illegal to audio record a private conversation without the permission of everyone being recorded (RCW 9.73 Privacy, Violating Right of). But there must be some expectation of privacy. If the recording is say on a public street, then there is usually no expectation of privacy.
Oddly, it is generally not illegal to record video only. There are some exceptions, such as when the person being recorded has some expectation of privacy (in Washington RCW 9A.44.115, on federal land 18 USC 1801). And there can be restrictions on how the recording is used. Defamation, invasion of privacy, false light, copyright, trademark, right of publicity and many other areas of law may come in to play.
So it depends.See question
I am in a class here at WSU where while we would normally be protected by the education clause, we were asked by our instructor to refrain from using pictures, sound files, etc that would otherwise get you sued for infringement if used professiona...
First of all, the words “All Rights Reserved” are not part of the U.S. copyright law. They are part of an international convention, usually referred to as the U.C.C. That convention has largely been replaced by the Berne Convention. I will presume you mean that the works have a copyright notice on them. Please keep in mind that the copyright notice is not required. You should assume that any work you find on the Internet is protected by copyright law unless you know for certain otherwise.
You mention the “education clause” There is no sweeping exception from copyright infringement for educators. There are some favorable rules for educators, but they are generally pretty minor.
How much do you need to change a work to avoid infringement? There is no clear line, but basically you need to change it 100%. That is, you need to come up with your own works, rather than taking creative expression from others. Keep in mind that ideas are not protected by copyright law. Generally, you can use an idea you see in a work as long as you then provide your own creative expression. But see below, there are exceptions.
I tell my clients that as a rule of thumb you should ask someone to look at your work and at the original work. If that person thinks you based your work on their work, you probably committed copyright infringement.
There is a concept called fair use that will allow some copying. It is a complex area of copyright law. Any discussion of fair use goes way beyond what can be said on AVVO.
Copyright law is very complex. There are many rules, and there are many exceptions. As you will read over and over on AVVO, you really need to talk to an attorney in person about your specific situation in order to get an accurate answer.See question
when you count it out? Also when you have to file an opposition to a motion 11 days before a hearing does that also include weekends - if it doesn't than why don't they write in the law "court days" which would more obviously imply not to count we...
I am sure you have heard attorneys say that you really should not handle a lawsuit without an attorney. Litigation is very complex for a number of reasons. This is one example. You can not read one court rule all by itself and presume to know what it means. You need to know all of the state court rules, and all of the local rules in order to correctly interpret each rule. As a litigator, I have read all of those rules many times, and am constantly reviewing them. I have years of experience using them.
In your case, most courts have separate rules that deal with your issue. You do not say what court you are in. If you are in King County Superior Court, you need to look at state rule CR 6(a) which says that
In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these rules, by the local rules of any superior court, by order of court, or by any applicable statute, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday or a legal holiday, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, a Sunday nor a legal holiday. Legal holidays are prescribed in RCW 1.16.050. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is less than 7 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation.
Good luck.See question
The defendant filed a Summary Judgment against me on July 30, 2015 and the hearing is on August 28, 2015 at 2:00 pm at Superior Court of Washington County of Snohomish.
First look at the Washington state court rules of civil procedure. They will tell you the timeline in general. Then look at the local rules of civil procedure for Snohomish County Superior Court to see if there are any rules specific to Snohomish county that override the state rules. Then look at a calendar and calculate the exact date. Keep in mind that both the state rules and the local rules have rules on which days to count (weekends?, holidays?, etc.). All civil rules are on-line these days.
And make sure to look at all of the rules. In each set of rules, there is a section on summary judgment and then there is a different section on motions, and there may be other sections that apply as well.
Does that sound complicated? Well it is. When I was starting out as an attorney I was constantly reading and re-reading the rules. I still spend a lot of my time reading and trying to interpret the civil rules.
Maybe an attorney will do the calculations for you this time. This is a good example of why litigation is not easy and whenever possible, you should hire an attorney.See question
We have a small home metal design business. We would love to sell some designs at craft fairs, but want to get permission first rather than a cease and desist letter! Where do I start?
Basically you don’t. The NFL is very aggressive at policing the use of their marks. So I would not recommend you use them without permission. Getting permission will be impossible.
The NFL has a merchandise licensing application on line. Feel free to check it out. I have not read it in a while, but it says something like you have to have had at least a million dollars in licensing sales in the last year, or they will not talk to you. And that makes sense. They are a multi-billion dollar industry. Their trademarks are very valuable to them. It would take them many hours to evaluate who you are, what the deal might be, and whether your use is safe in that their trademarks are protected. That all costs them a lot of money. There is a risk to them whenever they deal with a new company. They would not possible make a profit on a small deal such as the one you are talking about. Sorry. Perhaps you could start with a smaller business.See question
I took the photos myself and uploaded them online but still I was underage in the photos. Isn't that publishing/ distributing child pornography? Do I have grounds to sue?
You raise several issues.
Most important is the issue of child pornography. Many people think that any nude picture of a minor is child pornography. That is not true. The picture has to be intended to have some sexual component. Amazon openly sells many books that contain nude but not sexual pictures of minors.
In Washington the term that is used is to define child pornography is “depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct” (RCW 9.68A.). The federal definition is similar (18 USCA 2256). There may be other broader definitions out there. So whether your pictures are child pornography depends on what is in the pictures themselves and how they are perceived.
However that is very fine point. As I said, many people, including many prosecutors, will be offended by any nude pictures of a minor. You risk being charged with a crime simply for posting a nude picture, even of yourself. A judge or jury may also be offended and find you guilty. You also risk being turned down for jobs, now or at any point in the future. I strongly advise you to take down those photographs.
Normally, sending a link to a blog to a third party is fine. If the link is to child pornography, then yes this might be seen as distributing or promoting child pornography. But sending a link to your parents is likely to be interpreted as being harmless.See question
It won't let me access the Internet and won't go away. Whathe do I do?
This is a pretty serious scam. If often sounds like a real government agency is after you. Sometimes they have your picture which they probably got off of your webcam. Do try to remove it yourself, but my experience with clients has been that you have to pay someone to remove it. There are many computer repair companies who offer virus removal services. They see it all the time. I don't know anyone who has paid the scammer, but in online discussions it appears that if you pay them, nothing happens. They do not remove the virus.See question
I am writing a "fiction" novel. For 6 years I worked in a very hostile work environment - a tribal owned casino. In the novel I want to use my work experiences, naming names of people who harassed me without end which lead to wrongful terminatio...
You should not rely on your publisher. You need to talk to a literary attorney such as myself now while you are writing the book. There is no way you can eliminate the risk of being sued. You can reduce the risk if you want to, but you might ruin the impact of the book if you are too cautious.See question