Skip to main content
Niranjan Fred Thiagarajah
Avvo
Pro

Niranjan Thiagarajah’s Legal Cases

198 total


  • People v. A.Z. (Burglary)

    Practice Area:
    Criminal defense
    Date:
    Mar 23, 2015
    Outcome:
    Reduced to misdemeanor
    Description:
    Client accused of felony grand theft auto. Initial offer was plead to a felony and receive 6 months jail. After negotiations, client pled guilty to a misdemeanor and received 74 days house arrest.
  • People v. V.G. (Battery)

    Practice Area:
    Criminal defense
    Date:
    Mar 09, 2015
    Outcome:
    Case dismissed
    Description:
    Client accused of assaulting a bouncer after being thrown out of a bar.
  • People v. N.V. (Vehicle Code violations)

    Practice Area:
    Criminal defense
    Date:
    Mar 09, 2015
    Outcome:
    House arrest; no jail
    Description:
    Client had three pending cases. Case #1 was a 2nd time DUI and driving on suspended license. Case #2 was a hit and run and possession of controlled substance. Case #3 was another driving on a suspended license.
  • People v. A.D. (Hit & Run)

    Practice Area:
    Criminal defense
    Date:
    Mar 05, 2015
    Outcome:
    No charges filed
    Description:
    Client received a letter from police regarding a hit & run investigation and they requested an inspection of her vehicle. I spoke with the officer in charge of the case and convinced him this was a civil dispute. Officer agreed not to pursue criminal charges.
  • People v. A.F. (Domestic Violence)

    Practice Area:
    Criminal defense
    Date:
    Feb 11, 2015
    Outcome:
    Jury Trial -- Not Guilty
    Description:
    Client allegedly choked girlfriend and smashed her phone, computer and tv after he found out she was cheating on him. Client charged with felony assault, felony vandalism and felony witness intimidation. Case went to jury trial and jury came back with Not Guilty Verdict for the witness intimidation and hung 10-2 in favor of Not Guilty for Vandalism and Assault.
  • People v. J.V. (Domestic Violence)

    Practice Area:
    Criminal defense
    Date:
    Jan 20, 2015
    Outcome:
    Reduced to disturbing the peace; no jail
    Description:
    Client's wife called 911 after being assaulted by client. Client admitted to police that his wife was pissing him off, so he told her to "shut the fuck up" and then grabbed her and began shaking it. Client also accused of punching his wife twice with a closed fist.
  • People v. V.K. (Shoplifting)

    Practice Area:
    Criminal defense
    Date:
    Jan 20, 2015
    Outcome:
    Charges dimissed
    Description:
    This was client's 2nd case. She had already been convicted of shoplifting before, but we managed to negotiate a dismissal of her current case.
  • People v. A.S. (Assault on police officer)

    Practice Area:
    Criminal defense
    Date:
    Jan 12, 2015
    Outcome:
    Convinced DA not to file charges
    Description:
    Client was arrested for assault on a police officer.
  • People v. A.S. (2nd DUI)

    Practice Area:
    Criminal defense
    Date:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Outcome:
    Wet & Reckless
    Description:
    Client arrested for 2nd DUI. Convinced DA to reduce charges to Wet & Reckless with no jail time.
  • People v. J.R. (Assault & Vandalism)

    Practice Area:
    Criminal defense
    Date:
    Dec 17, 2014
    Outcome:
    Charges Not Filed
    Description:
    Client accused of taking a tire iron out of her car, vandalizing the victim’s car and then throwing the tire iron at the victim.  Final Result – Met with the prosecutor’s office and convinced the prosecutor not to file charges as long as client pays for damage to victim’s car

Disclaimer

The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. The outcome of each legal case depends upon many factors, including the facts of the case, and no attorney can guarantee a positive result in any particular case. The attorneys at the Law Offices of Fred Thiagarajah make no guarantees, warranties, or predictions about the outcome of your legal case. We also make no representations that the quality of legal work to be performed is greater than the quality of legal work performed by other lawyers. Our prior results, including successful trials and settlements, do not guarantee a similar outcome.