We'll help you find the right solution for your needs
Does this sound like your topic?
|Award name||Grantor||Date granted|
|Southern California Super Lawyer/Patent Lit||SuperLawyers||2015|
|Who's Who in the World||Marquis Who's Who||2014|
|Super Lawyer/Patent Litigation||Southern Caliiforna Super Lawyers||2014|
|Super Lawyer Patent Litigation||Southern California Super Lawyers||2013|
|Who's Who in the World||Marquis Who's Who||2012|
|Southern California Super Lawyer Patent Litigation||Super Lawyers||2012|
|Southern California Super Lawyer Patent Litigation||Super Lawyers||2011|
|Trade Secret Litigation||Legal 500||2010|
|Southern California Super Lawyer Patent Litigation||Super Lawyers||2010|
|Southern California Super Lawyer Patent Litigation||Super Lawyers||2009|
|Who's Who in the World||Marquis||2008|
|Who's Who in America||Marquis||1994|
|Partner||Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe||2008 - Present|
|Partner||McDermott Will & Emery||2002 - 2008|
|Partner||Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly||1976 - 2002|
|Law Clerk for Hon. Roy L. Stephenson||United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit||1974 - 1976|
|Association name||Position name||Duration|
|Howard T. Markey IP Inn of Court||Founder and Program Co-Chair||2014 - Present|
|The Sedona Conference||Member and Dialogue Leader||2014 - Present|
|Federal Bar Association||Vice Chair Senior Lawyers Division||2013 - Present|
|International Association of Defense Counsel||Intellectual Property Section||1993 - 2002|
|Samsung v. Matsushita||Litigated a 19 patent suit on plasma tv technology|
|Mattel v. MGA||Won on all counts.|
|See all legal cases|
|Univ of Iowa COL||N/A||law||1974|
|Protecting and Litigating Trade Secrets in California||Recent Developments in California Trade Secret Law||2011|
|IP Licensing in 2009||Licensing Implications in the Trend Toward Litigation||2009|
|Patent Infringement Claims, Opinions of Counsel and Attorney-Client Privilege||Post-Seagate Developments||2008|
|Patent Infringement Claims Post-Qualcomm: Reassesing the Need for Opinion Letters||Use of opinions of counsel in patent infringement litigation||2008|
|Patent Claim Construction||Maximizing the Use of Intrinsic Evidence||2008|
|Patent Litigation 2007||The Impact of KSR v. Teleflex on obviousness||2007|
Posted by anonymous
I have used Mark professionally for nearly 20 years. I first retained him, as part of a national team in a complex patent infringement litigation. Not only did he work seamlessly with the other (big ego) lawyers, but he provided significant insights that helped us secure a jury finding of willful infringement. The case ultimately went to the U.S. Supreme Court and the result led to incremental sales of several billion dollars.
Since then, I regularly used Mark in a wide range of counseling, negotiating and litigation matters. I always found him remarkably knowledgeable and extremely creative in successfully achieving client-driven solutions to the most thorny business issues.
In my career, I have worked with thousands of lawyers in hundreds of law firms, and I've been responsible for more than 800 jury trials that led to verdicts. Mark can hold his own against any of these lawyers, and is superior to all but a small handful.
I recommend Mark without hesitation
Marc Brown, Copyright application Attorney
I had the pleasure of being Mark's partner for over a decade. Mark is an outstanding IP lawyer and powerful advocate. He is a quick study, knows how to get his points across to judges and juries, is steady under turbulence, and litigates with integrity.