We'll help you find the right solution for your needs
Does this sound like your topic?
If I've used up all of my paid vacation and paid sick days, and my company doesn't offer personal days or anything else, what can I do to take time off for a wedding (during the week )? Obviously it's not any kind of permissible leave. Can I just....
You can request an unpaid day off. Your employer can choose to authorize it or not.
Unless you have a contract saying differently, you are an employee at will. That means you can terminate your employment at any time for any reason. Your employer can do the same (but it can't terminate you for an unlawful reason, like your gender or race etc.). If your employer does not authorize you taking the day off and you do not show up for work, then it can lawfully discipline or terminate you.
I hope this helps you make your decision about what to do.See question
My understanding is the minimum salary is $37,440 per year to be considered exempt. Is there anyway someone who makes less than that amount be considered exempt from overtime?
A true independent contractor could make less than double the minimum wage (which is the requirement I assume you are referring to in your question) and still not be entitled to overtime wages.See question
Can someone please define the two and why one would be preferred over the other.
Here's a tutorial on the superior court's website. http://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/portal/page?_pageid=55,1555406&_dad=portal
Whether one is preferable over the other depends on your particular situation.See question
Am I required to answer my work emails on day off when they do not pay for phone?
I am not sure how your phone or laptop fit into the equation. The answer to this question depends more on your employment relationship with your employer. Are you an exempt salaried employee? A non-exempt hourly employee? Or perhaps some other classification? What is your job description?
Here is why these distinctions are important. If you are exempt and paid a salary, then it may be a reasonable expectation of your employer that you are available to respond to work related questions even when you are away from the office. You would be compensated for this work in the form of your salary. On the other hand, if you are a regular hourly employee, you should not be required to do work when you are "off the clock," at least not without being compensated (by the hour) for your work.
To answer your question definitively, we need more information from you.See question
I was emailed a few pages of useless discovery, instead of the expected thousands. The attorney referenced to him putting it also in the mail. I never received it. When I got my mail yesterday, when I came home, defendant had dropped something at ...
The simple answer to your question is "no." One party is not relieved from complying with the discovery statutes simply because the opposing party has failed to comply. The Code of Civil Procedure contains mechanisms to enforce a party's failure to comply with discovery requests. The party who believes that the opposing party has failed to comply with the discovery rules can bring a "motion to compel." There are strict time limits associated discovery motions. You should get well acquainted with the Code of Civil Procedure OR retain the services of an experienced litigator. The California Discovery Act begins at CCP s 2016.010. Good luck to you.
With regard to bringing up the issue at the case management conference, it is unlikely the court will be willing to hear any argument regarding a discovery dispute at the case management conference, but there is no express rule I am aware of against bringing the matter to the court's attention. Most likely, however, the Court will direct you to review the Discovery Act and to bring a noticed motion to compel.See question
Ive worked in the same restaurant for about 9-10 months. The restaurant was sold about a month or two ago, and the new owners fired me due to "going in a different direction" and "everyone else is full time and you only work a few hours a week, so...
Absent a written contract your employer has the same right to fire you that you have to quit. They do not have to give notice or give you a compelling reason for letting you go (just so long as the reason is not unlawful--like your age or sex or race). Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it doesn't sound like your employer has done anything unlawful.See question
So I work 5 days a week. 8 hours a day. With two hours overtime (optional) & overtime on Saturday. Also optional. I get paid bi week. The first week of my pay period I know I worked over time after my 8hours & few ours on Saturday. I don'...
Assuming you are a non-exempt employee (which appears likely since you imply that you have been paid overtime in the past), all hours that you work that are more than 8 hours in a single day OR 40 hours in a week must be paid at the overtime rate. There is no provision of law for substituting hours in the way you described in your post. It sounds like you're owed some overtime...See question
"I work for a company that operates all over California. I was hired for one specific area, yet my employer is now telling me that I Have to go out of town for the whole week and work. Is this Legal?"
Unless you have a contractual agreement with your employer they are entitled to direct where you work. Employment in California, absent contractual agreement, is at-will, which means that you are not obligated to travel to work, but your employer is also not obligated to continue the employment relationship.See question
2 cal Code of Regulations § 7287.4(d)(1)(B) (B) Any conviction for which the record has been judicially ordered sealed, expunged, or statutorily eradicated (e.g., juvenile offense records sealed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sectio...
It's unclear to me the question to which you would be answering "no." Nonetheless, assuming this regulation is applicable to your situation, do not forget about the part that says "AND the case has been judicially dismissed pursuant to Penal Code section 1203.4." Has your case been judicially dismissed?See question
The property and the roads on on Birch Hill are all private with no legal access.
The cost of an easement is probably better posed to a real estate agent or broker familiar with that area. Here we are more suited to answer the legal questions that may be related to such a purchase and sale. For example, determining the steps you might take if the private owners of the 28 parcels don't want to sell you an easement.See question