My roommate is trying to get me evicted from my home so he can have his ex sister in law move in. I'm disabled with Spinal Stenosis, which affects all my nerves, when I get upset I do alot of falls, and having her here is affecting my disability.
This is a tricky situation. If that person you want out can show that they "live" there, then they automatically have tenant's rights and you must use the court system to evict them. Now granted, 5 days is a very short period of time, but it is not to say that a sneaky freeloader couldn't establish residency at your place at that time. For example, on day two the person may have gone to DMV to get new license with your address on it. Might have changed all bills to come to your address. And even more complicated, does it look, from an objective standpoint, like this person lives there or is couch surfing a few days? If they have clothes in your closet, key to the house, parking spot, etc., it will sure look like they live there. Once that happens, you must do an unlawful detainer to get them out. Do NOT just change the locks on them or you could get in trouble. Hope this was helpful.See question
In 2011 I had a hiatal hernia repair and was released from the hospital with complications of not being able to breathe. I got admitted back in to the hospital within an hour of being released. The doctor told me it was in my head. Since then I've...
I am so sorry for what you have gone through. However, you have a case of potential medical malpractice, which happens to be an area of law that fewer and fewer attorneys I observe are practicing. Having said that, they are out there, and some are unbelievably talented and get results that even put me in shock. Please contact a very experience, reputable and aggressive (as well as one with a firm or on their own, either way, one that is well financed to take the case to trial if necessary. These are not cheap or easy cases). I wish you all the best.See question
an insurance company has committed bad faith , using all the tactics in order to diminish and undervalue a case. after so many years the company refuses to do anything right except these acts below; Unjustified contention and/or "lowballing" r...
Sadly, it is so typical that these companies commit bad faith with such reckless abandon. I have to say, perhaps some of my most gratifying wins come from suing insurance company for their despicable bad faith against their own insured often who so desperately need and deserve what they are entitled to. So the simple answer, yes, you can finish the underlying suit, then start a brand new lawsuit for serious damages and money against the insurance carrier directly. As always, be sure to use an attorney experienced in these cases as they are fought ruthlessly hard as you might imagine.
Best of luck to you!
I have a domestic violence restraining order against my my wife, she has gone to jail for violations. We are in the beginning stages of divorce. Her forensic accountant charged & hit me with his brief case in front of court house; a police repor...
First, your title says you were hit/struck by your wife's ATTORNEY. Then you say it is your wife's forensic accountant, which to be honest, would be a lot less disruptive to her case than having to find a new attorney. Forensic experts are a dime a dozen in this business.
However, you were the victim of assault, batter, intentional infliction of emotional distress, assault with intent to do great bodily harm, and a myriad of other civil and criminal charges. Contact a lawyer immediately to explore suing this unprofessional disgrace to the industry that hit you. Make sure you only use a litigator, one not afraid and in fact almost excited to take this case to trial, and don't speak of this again to anyone until you do so. No more public avvo talks or otherwise. You can communicate privately with attorneys, such as myself or other fine attorneys on here, but do not let this public record come back to haunt you in court.
As for getting this person disqualified, I would not, I would tell the judge you are afraid to be within 100 feet against him, get a restraining order tomorrow, and like I said, contact an aggressive, yet cunning, litigator/trial attorney to make mince meat out of this guy. Sounds like he has money, a horrible temper, and is a perfect target for teaching a lesson on why he should behave like an adult.
I hope I was helpful. Let me know if there are follow up questions on here.
my friends got in fight in january and one suffered a serious facial injury. the conflict started when friend 1 grabbed friend 2 and threw him to the ground. both quickly got to their feet, and in reaction to what he thought was a fight friend 2 t...
I like the way you tell the story. Very factual almost as if you have taken a few law courses or are in law school yourself. But as to my opinion, and please know that this is not to be taken as legal advice as I would need a lot more information before being able to render such advice, but it would seem like friend 2 should not only consider a career as a boxer, but he may have been justified in throwing those punches. It sounds like Friend 1 was the aggressor (probably drunk or intoxicated perhaps?), and as you said, the punches by 2 were defensive in nature. It sounds like two acted reasonably in trying to avoid hurting 1, but 1 was not going to be satisfied until he apparently learned to leave well enough alone. I have handled several cases like this, and based on your fact pattern, I would much prefer to represent Friend 2 as he seems likely to be found innocent of any civil claims brought in court if that is what friend 1 ultimately does. In fact, if the facts are as you say, and friend one DOES sue over this, I would advise friend two to get a very good lawyer and counter sue as well as defend himself in the lawsuit against him. I could elaborate on the causes of action i would include in the counter suit, but that does not seem to be part of your question. So hopefully they both move on with their lives, but if 1 decides he wants to regain his pride by suing for damages, make sure 2 fights back just as well as he did during round one.
I heard that I could apply for a certificate of rehabilitation after a certain number of years, and was wondering if the 5 years CA residency requirement means I must show I have lived in CA for five years, or that I have lived in CA for five year...
I must agree with my colleagues here. The issue, generally speaking, would revolve around the time of the filing of the Petition in your effort to obtain any sort of Certificate of Rehabilitation, and would not be determined based on the time you completed your probation. Did you have an attorney who represented you in the underlying case? If so, as a matter of good business and being a good person, I would think he or she would be happy to offer you free guidance on this issue and possibly confirm or deny the accuracy of the information we have provided for you here. Remember, we know very little about the details of your situation, as opposed to your prior counsel (assuming you had one) who presumably has intimate and intricate knowledge of the facts, details, politics potentially involved, etc., and if not, would be in the bets position to quickly acquire that information for you. You can also request a complete copy of your entire file held by any attorney who represented you on that case (or any case for that matter).
I hope this information has been helpful and wish you the best of luck.
A judge cut of plantiff's opening statement by saying ' I don't want to hear that ". And that part was the critical part of the case. Does he violate the First Amendment?
I am a bit confused but let me see if I can offer some insightful information (obviously if you want legal advice you must immediately contact an attorney to obtain it; all information given here is only for purposes of attempting to be helpful and for informational purposes only).
First, you indicate that the judge (I am going to presume we are dealing with a standard 12 jury civil litigation matter in Los Angele County for now; the rules/procedures may be different elsewhere) "cut off an opening statement because he does not want to hear an ARGUMENT." (emphasis added to last word). I emphasized that word because the judge is absolutely correct in my opinion in that opening argument, while ironically containing the term argument within its title, is NOT the time for argument. It is a time to present to the trier of fact (in this case either a jury or judge it seems) the entire summary or importtant points of your case that you intend to show and prove to the jury. It is factual in nature. The moment you start letting litigants or lawyers start actually doing their argument (which there is plenty of much better placed time for at the end of the case in "closing arguments"), you have instantly violated a fundamental part of the trial process and gone too far. In many cases, the judge would be well within his/her bounds to have declared a mistrial as you cannot "unring the bell" once certain things, especially contentious, argumentative and issues of great dispute, are said in front of the jury.
Also, and I do not profess to be a Constitutional Scholar although I handle quite a bit of civil rights matters, as best as I can tell, your first amendment rights stop at the courtroom entrance. Should you doubt that, try telling the judge an insulting comment about his mother or spouse for example and watch how fast you wind up in contempt and likely jailed. OBVIOUSLY i was making an extreme example to illustrate a point. I do not believe you have your first amendment rights in a courtroom with the judge to the full extent you normally do (just like you can never yell fire in a crowded movie theater despite your first amendment right being in place); I feel you waive your right, to a degree, to have the right to free speech by availing yourself to the Court system (which, in many cases, the term Court itself is used to refer to the Judge and many judges won't speak of themselves in the first person but rather make comments like "After careful review, the Court hereby finds that there is substantial evidence to support an order of contempt against the Plaintiff and the Court overrules and disagrees with the argument made by Plaintiff that he was simply exercising his constitutional rights when he extended his middle finger towards the Court after previously being admonished by the Court to treat the entire Court and its staff with respect and to show respect for the entire judicial system...". The judge would be more clear and sincere in my opinion if stating the same hypothetical in the following manner: "I will not hear another word on this matter and no argument will be entertained by or for the Plaintiff at this time; I have made up my mind and hereby issue the following Order of this Court, to become effective immediately: I (Judge Joe Shmoe Smith) have had enough of your lip and smart mouth; and I clearly warned you to be careful how you acted in my courtroom. I told you what would happen if you disrespected me or this Courtroom or staff one more time Mr. Jones, and you don't seem to be very good at listening. I therefore hold you in contempt of court and sentence you to be taken into custody at this time to spend the next 24 hours in jail, as well as pay the court fines/sanctions in the amount of $1,000.00 withing two weeks from today. Mr. Jones, I sure hope you enjoy the next 24 hours and that you educate yourself on many things, especially the rules applicable to my courtroom and the limits on free speech in my courtroom.See question
I filed to be able to get a drug testing ordered by court, and to possibly change pickup/dropoff time. I was told itd be dismissed if I didnt show, but he had them change the agreement to later time, unsupervised and many other things! This canno...
Just to be clear, when you say "but he had them change the agreement..." are you referring to the judge, your opposing party, or who? I don't feel it is appropriate for me to speculate as to who you mean and unfortunately I cannot provide a meaningful response without either totally misleading or confusing you or until I get that information so I know all pertinent facts and there is no confusion as to what your legal issue is.
Generally, however, I always recommend looking at Calfiornia Code of Civil Procedure Section 473 if you are looking to have an order or judgmnent set aside, modified, or otherwise changed after the judge has ruled on i. So long as your failure to appear or comply in any way as you were supposed to was the result of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, orSee question
I've been a nanny for the past 12+ months. The family pays in cash without taxes being withheld. We got onto this topic last week and the mom said that I am doing something illegal not them. This week I told them I'll pay taxes, no problem. They w...
I don't want to be the bearer of bad news, and you definitely should seek further assistance from an experienced attorney, but it sounds like you both may be liable (or perhaps even that everyone has violated laws or committed crimes) for at least a few reasons. If you both went the cash payment route knowing you would not be properly notifying and likely paying the IRS money as you are required to, then you both likely have committed tax fraud. Your employer is also guilty it sounds of violating the Minimum Wage laws and perhaps other laws, states, or regulations.
Because of the potential seriousness here, I recommend immediately finding an attorney and perhaps accountant to ensure you are complying with all relevant laws and making sure you are not going to be exposed to potential criminal or civil liability relating to these matters. Once you have done that you can still go after your employer for any damages you sustained due to employer misconduct, or you may decide it was a lesson learned and move on. You should also have an attorney advise you as to what actions and positions you should or should not utilize with regard to your current and pressing employment circumstances and pending decisions as to how to move forward in the immediate future.
Glad to see you reaching out for help here. Hope this and other answers gave you some guidance.
Matthew Paul KrupnickSee question
The fees for the trial transcript were paid when the motion of a new trial was filed. The motion was denied. Now considering an appeal. Is there any additional fees need to be paid for the trial transcript again if the appeal would be filed?
I am not sure I understand your question. But basically if you have paid for testimony already once you shouldn't in most cases have to pay that fee for the same transcript again (unless you needed an "official" transcript that has never been oppened for example). If it is new testimony not yet paid for then you would likely have to pay for it.
Never hurts to talk to the reporter and let them know your situtaton and ask if they can work with you on the fee. Best of luck either way.
Matthew Paul KrupnickSee question