Avvo Review Score

4.9 /5.0

41 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (41) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 16 - 20 of 20 reviews | Recommendation

Posted by anonymous | January 01, 2012

Expert representation

When I found myself needing DUI representation, a trusted friend made some calls and told me to call Joe. My case was complex, involving multiple counts, an audio recording, and blood testing. Thoughout the course of my case, which took almost two years, Joe was simply impressive. We had hearings..., filings, and motions to deal with (two red ropes full), and he navigated through the judicial system with complete expertise. Last month my case went to jury trial. From jury selection to probing into the deep science of blood testing, he knows the right questions to ask and the right questions to raise; he also knows the right experts to bring in and the appropriate areas and content of information to present. I was acquitted on all four counts. I'm confident my case would not have been resolved to this degree without Joe. I would, without hesitation, recommend him to anyone needing representation.

Posted by Chris R. | January 10, 2011

Exceptional Defense Work

I was referred to the Office of Nesci & St. Louis by an attorney friend in my home state (Washington) as he had "checked around" for the most competent DUI Defense in Arizona. I spoke with a handful of other attorney’s around Maricopa County, all of whom had quoted various approximate fees’s and sug...gested different defenses that could be employed to attain an acquittal given the limited facts I could recount for them. Then my local attorney friend had received word of the one office I should inquire with if I wanted a defense beyond all defenses. The Office was Nesci & St. Louis; the phone number (520)622-1222 was soon to be one I would never forget. Here’s the Bottom line; my initial contact with Joe and all subsequent interactions with either he or His Associate Attorney Amanda were pleasant, educational, and confidence inspiring. The investigator who worked my case and prepared to testify on photographical and geographical evidence was as thorough as they come and undoubtedly would’ve provided excellent “expert witness” testimony. It is my opinion that if you are in need of an absolute top notch, Grade A++, “leave no stone unturned” defense…….and you’re willing to pay for it Look no Further than The legal team at Nesci & St. Louis. Ask For Joe & Tell em’ Chris from Seattle said they were the best!!

Posted by Jay | October 07, 2009

Client review of Joseph P. St. Louis

Mr. St. Louis handled our case professionally, and with attention to detail. He methodically collected the facts surrounding this complex case, prepared a defense, and presented a compelling argument. The Judge concurred with Mr. St. Louis's argument, and the case was dismissed. We would highly... recommend Mr. St. Louis for other clients.

Posted by Anthony | October 01, 2009

The Very Best Attorney Absolutely

Joe worked harder for me than I would have myself... Not only did he win my case but was a trusted friend through out the 16 months it took to get this horrible experience over.... I was charged with a ridiculous 2 counts of aggrevated assaut and reckless use of a fire arm.... I was innocent and joe ...proved to the jury that I was indeed innocent... As you can imagine , I can't say enough good things about Joe and his staff and office.... the are truely the best you will find....

Posted by anonymous | August 29, 2025 | Hired Attorney

Don’t be swayed by flashy credentials or big talk.

When you visit his office, you'll notice a Harvard certificate prominently displayed. It’s important to understand that this is not a law degree—he probably completed a short-term training program there, but not their law school, but he did not graduate from Harvard Law School. He graduated from the ...University of Arizona. In my opinion, this display and how he references it can be misleading. I'll explain... When you consult him, you'll also notice that he tends to boast about his involvement in high-profile cases. It was a high-profile death penalty case when I met him. Initially, I was impressed by these accolades and believed I was in capable hands. Unfortunately, that turned out not to be the case. He was neither thoughtful nor strategic in handling my case. Without properly consulting me or clearly explaining the potential risks, he encouraged me to speak with the police very early on—a decision that likely harmed my chances. In hindsight, I believe I may never have been charged had that conversation not occurred. He should have known at the time that I hadn’t even been formally charged, yet he proceeded anyway. The charges ultimately stemmed from what I said during that meeting. I initially trusted his judgment, assuming he had a solid plan. But over time, it became evident that he was overwhelmed with other cases and did not prioritize mine. I actually don't believe he prioritizing anyone's case. Before you hire him, I urge you to ask specific questions about how he plans to approach your case. Press him on the details. What you'll likely find is that, beyond the impressive-sounding credentials and stories, there’s little in the way of careful planning or individual attention. This attorney seems more focused on selling himself than truly advocating for his clients. Don’t be swayed by flashy credentials or big talk. If he doesn’t have time to sit down with you DURING THE INITIAL CONSULTATION, explain his strategy, and show real investment in your outcome—walk away. He told me we work on my case when it is time for trial, interviewing witnesses, etc., but I don't believe he actually ever worked on my case. I felt like he just did the bare minimum without thinking it through and charged me a lot of money for nothing. I wish I had listened to my gut and walked away from the beginning. There are much better attorneys out there. I wish you the best of luck

Joseph St Louis

Replied last August 30, 2025

The writer doesn’t claim I failed to do the work needed to prove their innocence. They were convicted of the crime they committed after confessing to it, but claim it is my fault they confessed. I’ve never had a client convicted based on a statement they made while I represented them. Ever. I didn’t represent the writer at trial - after I obtained a misdemeanor compromise from the victim saying they didn’t want to prosecute (which was no easy task), and the state wouldn’t immediately dismiss the charges on that basis, they got mad and hired another lawyer. Apparently, he lost their case at trial. This case was charged 7 years ago. My guess is the writer holds a professional license, has to report their conviction every 5 years, has just done so, is angry, and is looking for someone to blame so they are lashing out at me (ironically, that same impulse lead to their charges in the first place). It’s unfortunate, but I’m grateful to all the clients I’ve been able to help over the years who have taken the time to write positive reviews about me. When over 40 former clients feel strongly enough about how much you helped them and how positive their experience was with your office that they take the time to write a review, and one person is complaining that you are a complete fraud and don’t help people, the issue may be with the person writing the review and not the attorney being reviewed. Attorneys have an ethical duty to keep their clients’ confidences regardless of their personal interests, allowing clients to be open and candid without fear their attorney will disclose what they reveal. These rules prohibit me from providing details that would allow the client or their charges to be identified, even a client posting a review making false claims about me online. I know who this person is because I can count on one hand my clients who have spoken to the police during my representation. This person was charged with an offense that required they be arrested and taken to jail. I convinced the prosecutor to let them turn themselves in at court and avoid jail. The writer was convinced that the victim in their case should have been the one charged and insisted on making a statement to the police blaming the victim. We prepared for their statement, reviewed what they were going to say, and I warned them about the dangers of doing so and their potential to incriminate themselves, but they were adamant and made a statement. (That is one reason it took a lot of work to get a statement from the victim that they didn’t want to prosecute). Regardless, other than a client who wrote a 25-page letter to the County Attorney “explaining” their crime (and confessing to it) without my knowledge or consent, I have never had a statement a client gave while I represented them used against them. Here, I didn’t get the chance to keep it out or to beat the charges at trial. Regarding their other claims: The National College for DUI Defense used to hold their summer conference at Harvard Law School. I have received awards presented to me there, which I display in my office. I am a proud graduate of the University of Arizona College of Law, however, and have never claimed or implied I graduated from anywhere else. Why would I? My law degree is on the wall in my office, as is giant U of A flag. Nowhere on any website or in person have I ever made any misleading claims about my education. I hope it’s clear that I keep my clients’ confidences; I don’t “brag” about high profile cases. Unless someone is charged with a homicide, I wouldn’t mention my experience representing defendants in death penalty cases 20 years ago, when I was doing court-appointed work. It’s not a secret. It’s listed in my biography and easily obtained information. But if you come to see me regarding a DUI charge, for example, me bragging to you about winning cases 20 years ago where the death penalty was sought isn’t a real selling point in my mind and is not something I would do.

See All Client Reviews