Skip to main content
Dane Michael Johnson
Avvo
Pro

Dane Johnson’s Legal Cases

8 total

  • State of Texas v. J.D.

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Outcome:
    J.D. arrested for DWI, Blew .16, Case Dismissed
    Description:
    After aggressive questioning of the police officer that gave the breath test, officer admitted he coerced client into taking breath test. The prosecutor dismissed the case.
  • State of Texas v. B.P.

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Outcome:
    Blood Test of .24 was thrown out - Case Dismissed
    Description:
    Following a lengthy hearing on the admissibility of client's blood test of .24, Judge determined there was no consent given for treatment and teh blood test results were thrown out. Prosecutor dismissed case based on the blood evidence being thrown out.
  • State of Texas v. W.E.

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Outcome:
    Directed Verdict of Not Guilty
    Description:
    After vigorously cross examining the arresting officer about the stop, police officer was unable to articulate a valid reason for the stop. Judge granted a directed verdict of "not guilty" for the defense and client was acquitted.
  • State v. D.G.

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    May 27, 2009
    Outcome:
    Case was dimsissed after witness tampering exposed
    Description:
    Dane Johnson exposed witness tampering by government's lawyer and the state was forced to dismiss. Client caused a 5 car accident. Police arrived on scene and determined client to be intoxicated. Through aggressive cross-examination, Dane learned that a witness had been tampered with and the case was dismissed.
  • State of Texas v. J.M.

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Oct 07, 2008
    Outcome:
    Cllient charged with 2nd DWI found Not Guilty
    Description:
    Client charged with his 2nd DWI. Officers approached Defendant after her caused a motor vehicle accident. After smelling alcohol, the officers performed field sobriety test. They claim Defendant failed each of these tests. The jury disagreed and returned a verdict of "Not Guilty."
  • State v. D.S.

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Outcome:
    Dismissed After Exposing Problems With Breath Testing Procedures
    Description:
    Defendant was charged with DWI and took a breath test in a mobile breath alcohol testing van (Bat Van). After exposing ongoing problems with the Bat Vans, the government agreed to dismiss all charges.
  • State of Texas v. T.Y.

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Dec 06, 2013
    Outcome:
    Dismissed
    Description:
    After a thorough investigation of the arresting officer and his decision to stop client, it was determined that the officer did not have authority to stop client.
  • State of Texas v. D.B.

    Practice Area:
    DUI and DWI
    Date:
    Oct 01, 2013
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    Client was involved in a single car accident of the highway. Police officers claimed he failed all Field Sobriety Tests. Defense counsel exposed errors in the testing and the jury found client "Not Guilty"