Skip to main content

Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson, 116 Ohio St.3d 468 (Ohio 2007)

Case Conclusion Date: 12.27.2007

Practice Area: Constitutional

Outcome: Court adopted position consistent with amicus brief

Description: Plaintiff (Arbino) challenged constitutionality of Ohio's tort reform law. As amicus, the Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys (OACTA), defended the law as constitutional. The Ohio Supreme Court adopted a position consistent with the OACTA amicus brief in holding that Ohio's tort reform legislation is costitutional.

See all Legal Cases