Skip to main content
Anne Harvey

Anne Harvey’s reviews

     4.5 stars 33 total

Review Anne Harvey
  • Not just a lawyer...a friend

    5.0 stars

    Posted by Melissa

    I have experienced a divorce that lasted years. My ex is ruthless and abusive. I walked into Anne's office and knew she was the lawyer I needed. She talked straight and has never fed me what I wanted to hear. She is level headed and reasonable and helped me legally, she protected me, she became my friend. She isn't a hand holder but she will stand by you. She will defend you. And she wins.

    More 
    Hired attorney
    Anne Harvey’s response: “Easy-peasy with good clients like you!”
  • Real definition of professional

    5.0 stars

    Posted by Brandon

    Anne was my divorce lawyer and did an amazing job for me. She will talk in detail about all of your needs and give you the honest truth about expectations and move forward for what you would like to do. She is very honest, realistic, and professional. She also has a great team of paralegals that are very friendly and can help answer questions and get you in touch with anne for when you really need it. Worth every penny and I hope I never have to do it again but if I did, Ms. Harvey is the one.

    More 
    Hired attorney
  • Effective (Especially in Difficult Situations)

    5.0 stars

    Posted by Brian

    Anne was incredibly effective in what proved to be a much trickier divorce (due to opposing counsel) than it should have been. I appreciated her guidance and direct communication style -- in these situations, you really do want to know exactly what is going on and what the likely outcomes are.

    I would definitely recommend Anne to anyone seeking representation!

    More 
    Hired attorney
    Anne Harvey’s response: “That's the Challenge of divorce: what starts out straightforward can turn tricky and difficult in an instant. Glad we got through it!”
  • Very disappointed

    1.0 star

    Posted by Tara

    I paid $275 for a consultation with Anne, after being told she was taking new clients . When I called back to retain her, I was told then that she was not taking any new clients. I asked for a refund of $275 and was told no because she probably gave me legal advice. I informed the lady on the phone that Anne didn't actually give me any legal advice because there was so much to my case and I had talked the whole time besides Anne asking a few questions and so no legal advice was given to me. I was told she still would not refund my $275 for the consultation. I paid the $275 for the consultation only because I knew I wanted to retain her, and that had to be the first step in the process. Very disappointed I threw $275 down the drain and definitely would not have paid that if I knew they were going to turn around and then say they weren't taking new clients.

    More 
    Consulted attorney
    Anne Harvey’s response: “This person delayed 3 months after the consultation to contact me again, without explanation. There is a huge difference in caseload depending on the time of year.”
  • Weak and upfront

    1.0 star

    Posted by a client

    I hired Anne because years ago she demonstrated remarkable integrity.
    This time around things were funny. Anne seemed incapable of taking obvious initiatives, even ones we'd foreseen and agreed on, and she seemed helpless in the face of opposing counsel. Worse, as other reviews of her claim, she seemed obliging in revealing important details to opposing counsel.
    The ex had a pattern of abuse in their family which I desired evaluated, not as an accusation, but for reassurance-obviously our relation was strained. Anne had the court appoint, at my expense, someone who was not qualified to do such an evaluation, and returned useless testimony. I discovered that they were incapable during my interview-after I'd paid for it.
    In the mean time, I gather evidence of abuse, and general mistreatment of the children, such as their not being fed, social problems, allowing one sibling to mistreat the other, it's not conclusive evidence, but it was physical evidence-better than words alone.
    Son of a gun if this never makes it into my presentation, but the ex claims these same things, without that evidence, and it sails right through court.
    How this looks to me (my bias): Like Anne warned opposing counsel we had this evidence.
    How this looks to court (as I see it): When my assertions go to court: I am making disingenuous identical claims because the ex made them first.
    Allegations by the ex also sail right through court, despite even police reports to the contrary.
    Anne's response-if there was one, was 'it doesn't matter-we'll get it next time.' Except, next time opposing counsel was running the show again.
    Anne did not subpoena critical evidence to the case despite repeated requests to do so. I had to acquire police reports as well. She did not seem to advocate evidence she was supplied with, which, on two occasions was public domain.
    An important aside: I acquired a substantial sum of money, I was charged an unprecedented 3x her normal monthly fee, but I didn't see any extra work had been performed.
    Finally, the case turns a corner: New evidence, review by real experts, and Anne says directly: She will not present the evidence, and that experts will cost too much to get to court. She had been consulting with them during the process, and a path that didn't involve “too much” was available, had she but advised it. She had spent thousands of dollars in a process where she was the key advisor, then declared the approach was useless! Almost in the same breath, she told me opposing counsel's approach was our way forward.
    Yes, read that again. She continued that even if my children were being mistreated, the court would still give them to the ex.

    Summary: As other reviewers have said; she makes a mess then runs. Anne seemed be being played by the opposing counsel and helpless to prevent them from running the show. Attacks that would be defeated 'next time,' were never even addressed, then she'd be distracted by opposing counsel's next approach, and the pattern repeated.

    More 
    Hired attorney
    Anne Harvey’s response: “Wow! I must really be horrible. I can't publically say why this review is crazy-wrong. I will say this is why lawyers drink.”
  • Boxing Day

    5.0 stars

    Posted by Robin

    Anne Harvey is wonderful. We had a legal emergence on 12/26/15, the day after Christmas and a Saturday on top of that. I didn't know where to turn. I called and left a message with Anne and within 5 minutes she called us back. She was able to get us the information and legal advice we needed in a hurry. On Monday we met in the office and took care of what needed to be done. I don't know what we would have done that weekend is it wasn't for Anne Harvey and her staff.

    More 
    Hired attorney
  • Anne Harvey

    5.0 stars

    Posted by a client

    I used Anne Harvey and her team to represent me in a custody battle. Anne and her team were outstanding. They got to know me and my situation and provided very sound advice. Anne was always more than professional and was always very understanding. Anne and her team did an amazing job. They were very thorough and always very professional. I would strongly recommend Anne and her team for any Divorce or custody cases.

    More 
    Hired attorney
  • Dissolution

    5.0 stars

    Posted by a client

    Anne and her staff were very understanding and I truly felt Anne was looking out for my best interest. Anne took her time with me and explained things in terms I understood. I did not want a dissolution and I was not going to hire an attorney, but when the one my husband hired wasn't very competent, I decided I difinitely needed an attorney for myself. When I went for my consultation, her dog was there. I was very emotional and just petting the dog and having it there helped me feel better. I love animals and the dog made me feel calm and relaxed. (The dog stayed next to me the entire time I was there.) A colleague recommended Anne, and I'm so glad he did. I would highly recommend her and if a need would arise that I would ever need an attorney again, I will go back to her.

    More 
    Hired attorney
  • Divorce

    1.0 star

    Posted by a client

    I paid $250 just to TALK to Anne Harvey the first time and told court papers I received that stated what my ex wanted and who his attorney was. She said she would take the case but she didn't like facing my ex's lawyer.. Mr Wagner. My biggest request was I had info that I wanted kept between Anne and myself unless my ex was under oath.. Instead at a hearing she and mr Wagner went in with magistrate & she spilled the beans!!! Then came out & said maybe u should accept my ex's offer. At this time my ex DID not report all bank accounts as court requested! After Anne Harvey dropped me because I used up the rest of $$ I had I had to use legal aid. At final hearing my legal aid attorney found that my ex had $35000 in s bank account! Under oath he said he forgot he had this for 12 years!! We had only been divorced about 6 years. My attorney said don't worry.. The court is smart.. They won't let your ex get away with that cause of IRS!!! Make sure u have plenty of extra funds for ms Harvey!

    More 
    Hired attorney
    Anne Harvey’s response: “This person told the same story more or less in Columbus and, after investigation, it was found to have no merit. I stand by my representation and I support legal aid in the public defenders office, always”
  • The BEST

    5.0 stars

    Posted by Debbie

    My daughter went through a 3 year horrendous custody battle. Anne knows the law and gives good advice without getting caught up in the drama that goes with divorce. She reacts as needed but does not over react. Anne will give you the information that you need and advise without pampering. Given a true emergency, Anne has made herself available nights and weekends. There isn’t a better trial attorney. If you need an attorney who will stay the course and give you your life back, hire Anne!

    More 
    Hired attorney