Skip to main content

Hartman v. Goldman

Case Conclusion Date: 05.03.2011

Practice Area: Real estate

Outcome: Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. won a Decision and Order granting summary judgment to the insureds. ALB P.C. effectively argued that anything planted along the fence were de minimis pursuant to RPAPL 543(1),and must be deemed to be permissive and non-adverse.

Description: An adverse possession case of first impression before New York's Appellate Division

See all Legal Cases